Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

C and it's imperative friends

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 12:25

Do you think anyone will even recognize these languages 200 years from now? Only pure and sound languages will persist through the ages.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 12:48

Catapult and it's stone throwing friends

Do you think anyone will even recognize these weapons 200 years from now? Only greek fire and ballistas will persist through the ages.

Name: its 2015-02-18 12:54

its

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 13:07

>>3
It is imperative!

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2015-02-18 13:23

Only braindamaged academic wankers believe that bullshite. Everyone else realises that the whole fucking universe operates imperatively.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 13:51

Cudder is all talk and etc.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 13:55

my garbage-collected leaking-memory nest-of-of-inefficient-abstractions syntactically-diabetic "pure" language can't end in garbage of history

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:03

>>5
Cudder is a physicist now?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:10

>>7
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:13

i was just pretending to retarded

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:16

>>10
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:28

>>11
These quotes are not specific quotes to #posts content but threads content as generic whole. They address the thread, not specific posters. Quoted material could be what author thinks of as belonging inside the thread, with quotes signifying that he is paraphrasing the the the current thread mental image and not his own content. Its like a reference to the general direction of a thread or what is commonly known as "sarcasm quotes".
I don't expect autists to understand sarcasm, just imagine its a mockery of something that could belong in the thread.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:36

>>12
These quotes are not […] quotes
Then don't use the quote function for them. Thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:39

>>13
BBS Standards Nazi

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:44

>>12
The "who are you quoting?" nonsense is a bullshit meme. Don't give them a real answer.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 14:55

>>13
Quotation is not only "literal quote of something". It has grown into many types of "functions" in English. For example
scare quotes: the "innocent" bystander, doesn't mean literally innocent bystander but casts doubt on innocence of the bystander.
figurative quotes: many types of "functions" means figuratively many types of so-called functions,i.e. many types of something that isn't literally function or "literally"-> figuratively
sarcasm quotes: the mockery of something with indirect quotation, like "garbage collected languages are going to stay forever" with the meaning exactly opposite of what author thinks of it(he mocks the idea by pretending to agree and heap on praise or clarifications/extensions playing like he is the one being mocked)
out-of-context quotes: "don't use the quote" said Anonymous
email quotes:> just a shortcut for enclosing the text with""

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 15:04

>>16
Your quotes were neither scare quotes, nor figurative quotes, nor sarcastic quotes. The existence of sarcastic quotes is dubious. Your so-called out-of-context quote is actually direct speech. Email quotes are not a distinct form of quotation.

Please revisit basic English before you post again.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 15:45

>>17
<autism><sarcasm>English works exactly like what i learned in the third grade and never changed</sarcasm></autism>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 15:46

>>18
You didn't use irony punctuation.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 15:51

>>19
<autism><sarcasm>he didn't use the obscure typographical symbol that everyone SHOULD use! Thus his sarcasm is invalid</sarcasm></autism>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_punctuation#Scare_quotes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet_quoting

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 16:19

You're both idiots.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 16:41

>>20
Usenet quoting is not used for scare quotes. Your post did not contain scare quotes.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 18:22

Smoke MariJuana bro

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 21:11

>>10,12,14,16,18,20
Why do you feel the need to defend le hilarious greentext may may? Just call it what it is, a lazy shortcut for people who can't be arsed to articulate themselves like adults.

>>15,23
Well memed, my friend.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-18 22:28

>>5
when you look at a picture of a bird, what is the imperative sequence of thoughts that goes through your brain and allows you to determine that you are looking at a bird?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 1:19

>>25
you being a faggot

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 4:00

>>25
JTAG MY BRAIN

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 4:34

JTAG MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 5:48

>>5
Imperative languages are too much work to verify. Even hardware design languages are taking cues from the functional crowd these days.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 5:53

>>29
Hardware design is naturally declarative. It's not surprising.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 7:21

>>30
Any hardware design that trades state and time for space will have the exact same problems you see in imperative languages. Logic designers just don't want to admit it, because that would put them on the same level as the lowly programmers.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 8:07

>>31
Logic design and programming are two very different problems. Using terms like that just doesn't make sense. It's like saying you used a monad to chop a pineapple.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 9:18

>>32
Sounds like just about the only thing monads are good for.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 11:12

>>33
Sounds like just about the only thing monads are good for.
Unlike my dubs, check'em, which are much more versatile.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-19 15:20

>>32
Logic design and programming are two very different problems.

There is more overlap than you might think. Both RTL and software programs have to make tradeoffs between iterating in space and preserving intermedate values, or iterating in time and destroying them. The former is often faster and simpler to debug if you avoid synchronization problems, but eventually you run out of space.

The biggest difference is probably that RTL designers have perfect cycle by cycle control over when synchronized elements change state; software designers do not.

Name: logic, functional 2015-02-20 0:51

Just ignore me guys, I'm under 50 and think the world revolves around facebook and anything that is older than 2008 is bad.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 9:51

>>25
The proper way is to use imperative with object-oriented programming
0.Shape_Recognition=fuzzy_match(ObjectA,objectB,similarity)
1.Shapes=Currentview.recognize(Contours_3D)
2.for i in Shapes
3.if(Shape_Recognition(Shapes[i],Memory.Animals.GenericAbstractBird.shape,80%) Shapes[i].classification=Bird

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 11:02

>>37
This post made me depressed

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 11:41

>>38
Will this make you more depressed?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_neuroscience_of_visual_object_recognition#Basic_Stages_of_Object_Recognition

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 14:19

>>1
|Only pure and sound languages will persist through the ages.
such as JavaScript? web isn't going to change to another language.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -