Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Functional programming beyond Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 8:36

We have all learned functional programming in Haskell, but there are more functional languages like Lisp, Scheme, ML, and Clean.

Why should we even bother to look further than Haskell?

- You want your programs to run faster.
- Monads drive you mad (what are they anyway? warm fuzzy things?).
- You need objects.
- You sometimes need a more powerful module system.

http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/pub/Stc/BeyondFunctionalProgrammingInHaskell:AnIntroductionToOCaml/ocaml.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 15:50

(call-with-dubs-squared (thread-id!))

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 16:04

Czech em

Name: check em 2015-03-02 16:38

These consecutives!

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-03 1:48

>>121
thread-id does not mutate its arguments as it has none. Dubs guy confirmed to be a ^{^PO}S_{E_R}

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-03 2:35

>>124
something something dynamic variable something reference

*phew*

Newer Posts

Functional programming beyond Haskell

1 Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 8:36

121 Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 15:50

122 Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 16:04

123 Name: check em 2015-03-02 16:38

124 Name: Anonymous 2015-03-03 1:48