Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Functional programming beyond Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 8:36

We have all learned functional programming in Haskell, but there are more functional languages like Lisp, Scheme, ML, and Clean.

Why should we even bother to look further than Haskell?

- You want your programs to run faster.
- Monads drive you mad (what are they anyway? warm fuzzy things?).
- You need objects.
- You sometimes need a more powerful module system.
http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/pub/Stc/BeyondFunctionalProgrammingInHaskell:AnIntroductionToOCaml/ocaml.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-21 13:10

>>36
That's not a safety issue. There are a lot of things in Haskell that are incomparable.

>>37
Haskell Curry used it. Without combinatory logic the Haskell type system doesn't even work. Combinators are used all the time in Haskell, MLs, Lisp and even shit like Javascript.

A form of Peano numbers are used in miniKanren and probably core.logic.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List