Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Functional programming beyond Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-20 8:36

We have all learned functional programming in Haskell, but there are more functional languages like Lisp, Scheme, ML, and Clean.

Why should we even bother to look further than Haskell?

- You want your programs to run faster.
- Monads drive you mad (what are they anyway? warm fuzzy things?).
- You need objects.
- You sometimes need a more powerful module system.
http://www.cs.uu.nl/wiki/pub/Stc/BeyondFunctionalProgrammingInHaskell:AnIntroductionToOCaml/ocaml.pdf

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 11:45

>>88
Haskell allows redefining the Prelude, so what? The language's defaults matter.

explicitness is always better in terms of obvious correctness
So each type should always have its own distinct functions for everything and 8.0 + 4.0 is less correct than 8 + 4? Laughable, get back to your ungeneric C toilet-scrubbing.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List