Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

occulus rift is sexist

Name: kill yourself 2015-02-28 15:51

You can't even study compilers without being surrounded by people who think the occulus rift is sexist

https://twitter.com/Love2Code

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 15:57

I think pussies are sexist. How come I never got one? I demand a pussy right here and now!

Name: /twatter/ 2015-02-28 15:58

/twatter/

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 16:03

This is a simple articles about sex differences in vision.
Did you even read the fucking thing before shitposting on /prog/?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 16:21

Couldn't you have posted a link that wouldn't go out of date in 40 seconds?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 17:45

>>5
Lmfao, what's the matter? The thread will fall off the board in a day or two anyway

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 17:59

>>6
You appear to have stumbled on your keyboard. Please check your posts before posting them.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 18:01

So we have here a competent researcher who encountered a serious usability problem, did a lot of legwork to troubleshoot it, approached her findings with an appropriately scientific mindset, has a splendid grasp of the mathematical and geometric reasons underlying the phenomenon she analyzed, and remains humble about the level of certainty yielded by her experimental procedure... And then she put a dumbfire clickbait headline on the article she wrote.

What the hell happened?

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 18:13

>>8
nice analysis

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 18:18

>>8
competent researcher
approached her

Nice joke, buddy. Women cannot be competent researchers.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 20:13

>>10
epic internet in-joke, you may be interested in my dubs as a post-punch-line humour a la le xkcd

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 20:23

>>8
What the hell happened?
the editor told her that they wouldn't publish the article unless it has a sufficiently attractive headline

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 20:27

>>10
Stop making /prog/ look bad.

Name: Anonymous 2015-02-28 20:42

>>13
/prog/ looks worse without spoiler tags, shithead!

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 3:46

>>14
You're going to call me names, huh? So I'm a shithead? Is that right? Well you're a               !

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 6:29

>>15
I'm not a nigger!

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 7:37

Cracking up there.

That’s when a friend of mine stumbled over a footnote in an esoteric army report about simulator sickness in virtual environments. Sure enough, military researchers had noticed that women seemed to get sick at higher rates in simulators than men. While they seemed to be able to eventually adjust to the simulator, they would then get sick again when switching back into reality.
Being an activist and a troublemaker, I walked straight into the office of the head CAVE researcher and declared the CAVE sexist. He turned to me and said: “Prove it.”

Thank God I live in a society where any marxist commissar cannot just barge and yell at me for not adhering to every little detail of their flavor of whatever belief system is deemed equivalent to state religion.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 7:40

>>17
And yes activists == commissars, and have been for decades

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 7:41

>>13
Sexism is the right thing to do.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 8:54

>>19
Science is a belief system.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 9:14

>>17-20
This article is actually very interesting. You guys need to cool down. Blow off some steam at gamergate and come back when you're done.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 9:18

Thank God
I live in a society where any marxist commissar cannot just barge and yell at me for not adhering to every little detail of their flavor of whatever belief system is deemed equivalent to
state religion.
Yeah those Godless commies sure are a form of state religion, but Christianity isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 9:24

>>20
No.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-01 17:34

>>21
I never said anything about the research, which I indeed find useful (what a surprise - a useful piece of research from a feminist! haven't seen any before). Not because it would enable women to use 3D glasses, which they won't use anyway aside from a few feminists who would, for 3 days, just to prove they are not worse than men.
I welcome this research because it would enable trannies to do use 3D cybersex apps to have hot cybersex with me!

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 1:23

>>24
you are quite the edgy manchild

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 1:24

>>23
Yes.

>>21
gamergate
back to le 4chan manchild autist bro gamer

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 1:34

>>26
So you think I am a gamergate-or because I used to the term gamergate. You also seem to be aware of the term, so by the same logic, you are also a gamergate-or.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 2:22

>>8
She also accused the CAVE of being "sexist." As if men had designed it specifically to make women sick.

Fucking horse shit.

One of these days, we're going to snap, and then we're going to snap the necks of these feminist dykes.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 2:30

>>28
Go back to 8chan, pissbaby.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 3:46

>>29
No stay here.
Just don't make threats.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 9:40

@Love2Code On a lighter note, design flaws in what: the product or the gender?
lol

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 9:51

>>28
One of these days, we're going to snap, and then we're going to snap the necks of these feminist dykes.
And this, my friends, is why a drastic reduction of the population of males is necessary to secure the future of our children and the existence of the human race.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 10:08

>>28
She also accused the CAVE of being "sexist." As if men had designed it specifically to make women sick.
Sexism does not need to be intentional. If it makes women sick, but it doesn't make men sick, that's sexist, whether they designed it to be or not.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 14:22

█▀▀ █░░█ █▀▀ █▀▀ █░█ █░░█ █▀▀█ █░░█ █▀▀█ █▀▀█ █▀▀█ ░▀░ ▀█░█▀ ░▀░ █░░ █▀▀ █▀▀▀ █▀▀
█░░ █▀▀█ █▀▀ █░░ █▀▄ █▄▄█ █░░█ █░░█ █▄▄▀ █░░█ █▄▄▀ ▀█▀ ░█▄█░ ▀█▀ █░░ █▀▀ █░▀█ █▀▀
▀▀▀ ▀░░▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀░▀ ▄▄▄█ ▀▀▀▀ ░▀▀▀ ▀░▀▀ █▀▀▀ ▀░▀▀ ▀▀▀ ░░▀░░ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▀ ▀▀▀

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 15:48

Just take your Dramamine geez.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 17:26

>>32
Feminist activists are statistically unrelated to childbirth rates on accout of most feminist activists being frigid, lesbian or asexual bitches.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 20:44

>>33
My girlfriend's handbag and shoes are sexist. They look terrible on men, therefore they are sexist

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 23:02

>>37
I don't believe that you have a girlfriend. Before you respond, consider that the qualifications for a girlfriend are as follows: she cannot be a child, she must have been born a girl, she must be a girl now, she must acknowledge you as her boyfriend\girlfriend, she must exist in 3D space as a living person, she must not have a restraining order against you, and, of course, she must have fucked you at least once.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-02 23:30

>>38
she must have fucked you at least once.
What if they started dating no more than two weeks ago? Sex-positive rapist tsk.

Name: Anonymous 2015-03-03 0:49

>>36
you're never going to have a child you dumb breeder

>>37
you don't have one

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List