Fad Oriented Programming

Is it time to declare object orientation officially over and allow functional programming to take the crown as the latest fad?

Also, do you think logical programming will be next? Maybe I should brush up on my Prolog.

>>46
You're plainly full of shit. Ignoring your lies about syntax, I will press on.

Clojure "code" (strings, like any lisp) can be have any transient representation, like (like any lisps.) Whether or not this is so is a meaningless distinction because the terminals in any other Lisp are almost never represented by lists just like in >>41 except in toy examples.

If you read your SICP you would know you can have a lisp without any lists at all, and still run all the programs, as written, presented in the book.