Fad Oriented Programming

Is it time to declare object orientation officially over and allow functional programming to take the crown as the latest fad?

Also, do you think logical programming will be next? Maybe I should brush up on my Prolog.

>>6
It has functions and function composition too, but I wouldn't call it functional either. It has integers, and you use them just as often as objects, but I wouldn't call it integer-oriented (BCPL, though, that's integer-oriented. Everything is an integer in BCPL.)

The right way to do OO is to have an object oriented language. Smalltalk, Javascript, Lua, Io, even fucking Python is more OO than C++. Another not-OO language is Perl; it has all the OO features-*all* of them. You can do any style of objects in Perl, but it isn't used that way. Perl 6 otoh is OO.

Unless your language is "everything is an object" to some approximation, it's just not OO.