Fad Oriented Programming

Is it time to declare object orientation officially over and allow functional programming to take the crown as the latest fad?

Also, do you think logical programming will be next? Maybe I should brush up on my Prolog.

>>64
No it wasn't, you dimwit. I'd assumed that everyone knew that s-exps allow atoms, this fact is too basic and well-known to even mention it.

You're arguing about a form that could be valid in any Lisp

But in a Lisp it is not baked into the surface syntax of the language. In Clojure, it is. You can't just define a function whose arglist will be represented as a s-exp. That's just blatanly un-Lisp.