sexp

Is this a sane representation for s-expressions?

struct O
{
union {
Cell *o;
char *a;
};
int type;
};

struct Cell
{
O car, cdr;
};

>>2
You mean
struct O
{
union {
Cell *o;
void *a;
};
enum type t;
};
?
You're right of course. It was just quick and easy to make all atoms strings.

My main concern was whether it was reasonable to divide O and Cell like that.