>>121Why the fuck should I, if it's possible to write a self-contained, POSIX-compliant implementation of
echo without anything but the standard library? Note that the one in
>>12 is completely public-domain, as is the rest of ACU, so they could've just copied its direct simplicity.
I have a feeling this is just going to turn into another GNUish project like gnulib/libiberty/all that other shit. You are in a maze of twisty little dependencies, all alike...
This is certainly not in the spirit of ACU. I've already contributed enough in the form of ACU, if you don't want to make use of it and reinvent your own bastardised version of POSIX, then best of luck, gentlemen.