Haskell makes the best advanced purely functional programs!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AInJdhZycZ8

Stupid bullshit inside.

Yes, but

http://www.google.com/patents/US8620890

"System and method of semantic based searching" is a patent that cites Mentifex MindForth AI.

>>3 What exactly it cites?

>>2
You are wrong and foolish. Also, you are a disappointment to humanity.

>>1
You are right. That is a very good parody of haskull dabblers.

>>5
Really? You thought that video somehow relates to Haskellers? Some strange medicines you're on.

One question though, How does Spock compare with other Haskell web frameworks (such as Scotty, Happstack, Snap or Yesod)
Haskell web frameworks
Scotty
Happstack
Snap
Yesod

Haskell confirmed for a SCALABLE RESTFUL DYNAMIC INDUSTRY-STANDARD DEPLOY-ANYWHERE HEROKU NODE.JS CRUD WEB APPS language.

The amount of disdain from programmers with only a passing interest in Haskell is simply amazing to me.

The amount of disdain from people with only a passing interest in jewish culture is simply amazing to me.

>>8
I agree. And the disdain for correctness in general is even more scary.

People don't like abstract bullshit, especially forced abstract bullshit.
Deal with it. Any time you use the word functor, homorphism or the Monad, like 99% of audience will automatically ignore you.

In todays class, we're going to write fizzbuzz using homomorphistic abstract Continuation Monad using the Zeta-Peyton Class PolyFunctor Graph Theory within a Set-Category Priohapto-leftderived-Monadic TypeClassed LambdaNumeral-Theory Framework and IO-Safe Beta-reduced NetHomoCombinatoryIO-CurriedTextManip.

>>11

Idiots don't like abstract bullshit, especially forced abstract bullshit.
Deal with it. Any time you use the word functor, homorphism or the Monad, like 99% of idiots will automatically ignore you.

Fixed it for you.

>>13
You have to make the language palatable to idiots. Thats the secret to success of all popular languages. Forcing Haskell on people will not work. It will not get anywhere even if it was 10x faster than C++ and consumed less than 1/100 of C++ memory.(if you think its absurd, think of any web servers done in assembly using custom network card drivers)

>>14
Why target them at all? Face it, most programmers don't care. They want to mash out Java or PHP code for seven and a half hours, go home, eat some cheetos, and fuck their cheating wife while dreaming of Tyrone's twelve inch cock in their mouth. The computers are paid for by someone else, someone who is probably getting rich off them and probably just see's them as an expense. Why would he fucking care if the Jacob ``The Monopoly Guy'' Rothgoldsteinbergchild has to buy $50M more in Dell servers and Oracle support contracts because the Codemonkey just didn't care enough to not use bubble sort for that 1M element list? If he does better, does he see any benefit? Nope. He'll just get laid off that much quicker. So he'll stare at his desk for half the day, wishing he was dead and hating his life and wanting to go live in the woods away from any computers and technology, but knowing that he couldn't live without his machine slavedriver to tell him what to do. He's been burned out for years, and he will never recapture the magic that made him want to program again.

But that's not the group that pushes computer science forward. Thus, we don't need their audience. If they can't be bothered, fuck them.

>>14
avoid $ success at all costs

>>15
Who's Tyrone? Your homosexual butt-buddy faggot?

>>11,14
So the best criticism of Haskell you can offer is: "I am an uneducated idiot who's allergic to math and whose thinking was irreparably deformed by the errors of imperative language-mongers, and I don't want to learn anything new"? That is simply excellent, my friend.

>>17
He's a nigger I found online who agreed to be my slave. He lives in shackles in a cage beneath my bed, eats off the floor, and reams my delicate, white boypussy through every night and fills my no-good faggot butthole with his nigger cum and wipes my shit off his dick with my panties. So not butt-buddy, no, more like cock-slave.

>>18
No, the best criticism of Haskell is that it's shitty garbage that actively prohibits doing anything fun with without huge layers of misdirection. The criticisms of Haskell are independent of math aversion.

>>19
define "anything fun"

>>18

I am an educated autist who's addicted to math and whose thinking was irreparably deformed by the category theory and functional programming, I don't want to leave my ivory tower and write real programs.

Look i don't want to read thousands of pages on category theory to make a simple app. No sane person(except really autistic) does this. No one will want to deal with Haskell type theory when they have the choice of something easier. C++ is like a manual : do X to get Y, one page explains everything that X does by example. Now Haskell is like some autistic constructor set of concepts that all have really different context-sensitive functions and they all need to be done perfectly or else it would not compile or run at all. Now imagine you deal with this autistic constructor set with thousands of parts and combinations, without the knowledge of several math fields and whatever was in Simon Peyton Jones deranged mind when he wrote it.

Simon Peyton Jones - perfectly rational human being:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Simon_Peyton_Jones_01.jpg

>>21
Haskell does not require knowledge of category theory. Haskell is used to write real programs with great success. As for the rest of your bullshit, I didn't even read it because it's based on the two false premises I've mentioned.

>>23

Haskell does not require knowledge of category theory.
Haskell does not require knowledge of type theory.
Haskell does not require knowledge of evaluation strategies.
Haskell does not require knowledge of Monads.

Thats all fine when you write toy programs and copy-paste code that suppose to work, but once you start writing something original your approach falls on its face.

>>24
I never said the last three.

>>25
Others said it for you. Always claiming Haskell doesn't require X, then eventually admitting you need X, and then the specific kind of X that exists only in haskell.

>>26
Whatever. Enjoy your stupidity and inability to learn. Haskellers can write in your imperative shit langs, you cannot write in Haskell.

>>27 Ironically the thing "you cannot write in Haskell" is Haskell itself.

>>28
Yeah, Haskell also doesn't have native arrays or vectors, let's mock that too. Nobody cares what language the runtime system is written in, it's not a concern for a Haskell programmer.

>>29
I try to stay neutral while you people flail about in these dead dog flamewars, but a language that has to represent strings as linked lists deserves a bit of mockery.

>>30
It doesn't have to, there's the Text package for packed Unicode strings. It's just that the linked list type offers the ability to pattern-match on chars and have on-demand evaluation of strings.

>>31
Oh right, there's a library that allows you to have real strings. That surely makes up for the lack of native ability to be sure~.

>>32
Bitch.

>>31
What advantage does pattern-match has over regexp on unsafe imperative strings in evil C.

on-demand evaluation of strings

Thats called interpretation.

>>31
The Text package uses UTF-16, which makes it a fucking joke.

The design space must be limited so everyone should program the same specification the same way. So other's code can be grasped immediately without the aid of external documentation

Typical Haskelloid.

>>30 Even LITHP(Everything is a List) has real strings.
>>36 Obfuscated Haskell is extremely easy to write, so the idea is to force something common that could be understood without consulting the docs every seconds.

That is not dead dog which can eternal lie.
And with strange aeons even Monads may die.

>>38
LOL no, monads are immortal, you pathetic little bitch.

>>39
Acshually monads can be replaced by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniqueness_type