>>22They didn't have to change anything. They could have written a python interpreter in C#, compiled it, and glued it in with the rest of .NET. The only problem would be efficiency. It's because python is by it's very nature a shitty, inefficient language that can't even get rid of the GIL. If Haskell actually had people who wanted to write a good compiler instead of circlejerking over monads and
Maybe, it could be very efficient. Instead we have 1MB hello world programs. Maybe Microsoft could scrounge up a few competent people if you beg them hard enough.