Reasons not to use Rust

- You think programming languages should be closed and proprietary
- You like random pauses caused by forced collection of the garbage
- You think program start-up should take minutes so you use stupid VM-languages instead
- You like broken features and memory corruption
- You sell hardware and want to deploy inefficient scripting languages only to sell more
- You only do pure programs that don't interact with the world
- You are a retard who doesn't understand the concept of ownership

Anything else?

>>39 If security means "lack of obvious backdoors" you're terribly misguided. Security means the code is proven secure(e.g. CompCert , Ada Spark). Have "open-source" C code that "sorta does what it claims to do" is not a form of security. Open source doesn't make the code secure.