Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Do it [SchemeBBS]

Name: Anonymous 2015-05-25 10:11

Can we fucking wake up here sheeple? We need a SchemeBBS. We need to restore all of prog.db in it. This regex crap the admin does is no good right now for the job.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 15:12

>>119
Israhell follows the talmud. Thus it doesn't allow men to marry little girls, marry multiple female, be the master, rape2own, etc. The Talmud is basically the Jewish new testament. Does the same thing: raises the woman's status.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 15:17

>>121
The Talmud is a Jewish literary collection of teachings, laws, and interpretations based on the Old Testament Torah.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 15:21

>>121
Besides, many Muslim countries approve of marrying little girls. The Muslim God is a lot like the Hebrew God, so you'll fit right in somewhere in Morocco.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 15:37

>>116,118

Rest assured I do not live in a third world country where the law is afraid of people speaking their mind politically (at least not yet). Your anti-Putin sentiments will be ``safe'' (and off-topic) on SchemeBBSTM.

>>120
the only way online communities can come together is under the almighty rule of a single individual / group of individuals

In the traditional meaning of 'online community', absolutely, and here's what you're missing: Someone has to pay for it. Someone has to own the hardware and be responsible for what's posted on it. Someone, somewhere, has to have their name on a bill where money was exchanged to keep the network on and the data center employees paid and the domain name registered. And yes, when someone else is paying for the hardware that runs the service you are using, they are the boss, full stop. Even with many distributed models this is still the case, because things like trackers are still necessary.

I'm not brainwashed, I'm realistic. Your hypothetical bohemian distributed BBS network doesn't exist for one, but even if/when it does, it will never see wide adoption (see twister, posted earlier in this thread), because people, normies if you will, don't care about any of this stuff enough to figure out how to run complicated/technical software just to ensure they aren't being ``censored''. These people don't want to understand what is happening between typing in ``www.reddit.com'' and being blasted with sweet, sweet memes.

I'll certainly run a node though. Maybe, just maybe, if we/you manage to make the system stupid-simple to install and use, more than 5 other people will run nodes too.

>>117,121
Kill yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 16:25

>>124
Rest assured I do not live in a third world country where the law is afraid of people speaking their mind politically (at least not yet). Your anti-Putin sentiments will be ``safe'' (and off-topic) on SchemeBBSTM.
The problem is that child porn gets used for illegal dissent too. Provocateurs can employ child porn to anger the electorate, then point that police can't do anything, because government doesn't care about children.

On the other hand, government uses child porn to frame you and forge evidence. I.e. if you're against government, then police can find on your PC some child porn, even if you have liven in a cave and haven't seen any child your life. The same way people implant child porn to frame my opponent.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/12/16/wife-who-used-child-porn-to-frame-husband-gets-jail-time/

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 16:27

>>125
The same way I can implant child porn to frame my opponent.
self fix

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 16:39

>>121

good so we're in agreement

but if we can have many bosses, and we can choose between bosses it is much better than the current model of fiefdoms. kind of like with email, where you can choose between provider; but in a way that you could carry your identity/privileges with you if you so desired (enforced through the use of crypto).

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 6:32

>>124
Someone has to own the hardware
The users already have hardware to access the internet and have lots of storage for text.

and be responsible for what's posted on it.
Not with anonymity.

Someone, somewhere, has to have their name on a bill where money was exchanged to keep the network on and the data center employees paid and the domain name registered.
No domain name is needed. A few global ip addresses will be, but not all of them need to be global. There doesn't need to be a data center. Simply locate other users when they are online and share information with them. If you can't make a post because no one else is currently online, wait until you can connect and then send. For a small community like ours, a few people with external ips would need to leave their machine on for a good portion of the day, but for a large community like reddit the network would be huge.

And yes, when someone else is paying for the hardware that runs the service you are using, they are the boss, full stop.
Every user contributes to the up time of the community. They all share the cost and the responsibility. Everyone is equally the boss.

Even with many distributed models this is still the case, because things like trackers are still necessary.
bittorrent is not the best example of a distributed network. In later versions, trackers were done away with and hosted in bittorrent itself.

I'm not brainwashed, I'm realistic. Your hypothetical bohemian distributed BBS network doesn't exist for one, but even if/when it does, it will never see wide adoption (see twister, posted earlier in this thread), because people, normies if you will, don't care about any of this stuff enough to figure out how to run complicated/technical software just to ensure they aren't being ``censored''.
Twister is utter shit. But aside from that, ``normies'' are not using these because...oh wait...normies use bittorrent. And they use bittorrent to violate copyright, because violating copyright is illegal. A server that lets you download movies for free wont last long, but bittorrent is still around. Even after all this time, all they can do is jail the owner of a website that provides trackers (something that is already redundant now) and threaten a couple thousand teenagers with lawsuits. Meanwhile millions continue to violate copyright.

These people don't want to understand what is happening between typing in ``www.reddit.com'' and being blasted with sweet, sweet memes.
If the web that they used became controlled, they would seek something different. In chinese forums and social networks the gov pays people to post and steer conversations in favor of the state. Some people aren't satisfied with this and they take the risk of using a proxy to access facebook (what an improvement...)

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 15:47

>>128
You're basically describing Freenet.

Not with anonymity
The poster is hidden, but the node that he posted through is available to the network, so to silence them, just take down that node or flood it with fake propagation information. The hosting node is still non-anonymous, thus still holds the risk. So, what's to stop Anon R' Lejun from trying to pull #OpPedoTakedown or #OpAntiJihaad and taking over the network by just fucking with the node operators?

Also, why would the community be huge? It may work for /prog/, which has just a few people relatively dedicated, but most places are not like that. Very, very few think it is worth their time to give anything at all. Most think that they are being robbed just by showing ads, or think that ads are going to give them e-cancer. Now you want them to download software and run it?

Decentralization has it's uses, but security and anonymity isn't one of them. If you were defending a castle, would you rather have 10 guards each on 10 gates, or 100 guards on a single gate?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 15:48

a few people with external ips
Uh oh I think I found the bo--
Everyone is equally the boss.
Oh okay uh sure.
Twister is utter shit
Why? It has a shitty interface, but what else is so terrible about it? Isn't it a shining example of what you're talking about here? I'd like to hear a reason other than ``lol Brazil huefag'' please.
normies use bittorrent
Not really. More often people ``stream'' their shitty television shows or movies or whatever from short lived normal websites that use slow-to-DMCA-takedown file hosting providers for 3 mirrors and embed them on a page with 500 ads. If bittorrent were so commonplace these sites would no longer exist.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 16:12

These kind of things usually just devolve into child porn dens. If you're some tinfoil hat man who thinks child porn criminalization is an imposition from the powers that be, fine, you host it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 16:58

The poster is hidden, but the node that he posted through is available to the network, so to silence them, just take down that node or flood it with fake propagation information.
It's difficult to find out which node stored the information you requested for. If it were easy, freenet would be useless. It also has spam resistance provided enough of the network isn't constantly requesting the spam. Things that are interesting will take precedence over things that are not requested, and the spam will get deleted to make room for more popular things. Read the freenet paper, it's interesting.

2nd paragraph
See bittorrent. People are willing to seed. People are willing to do things if they think it's beneficial to a community.

3rd paragraph
How do you get anonymity without decentralization?

>>130
Some people do have external facing ips, or at least the capacity to set up port forwarding on their router.

If everyone shares the responsibility of hosting the data, then they all can make their own decisions about what to keep, assuming it's stored in plaintext, or remain oblivious using the freenet model.

Twister
I read his paper and found the author despicable. I would rather work on a project that's been around and is well researched like freenet than something an arrogant lone developer hastily threw together without a formal design.

bittorrent was extremely popular tenish years ago.
In November 2004, BitTorrent was responsible for 35% of all Internet traffic.[2] As of February 2013, BitTorrent was responsible for 3.35% of all worldwide bandwidth, more than half of the 6% of total bandwidth dedicated to file sharing.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bittorrent
Streaming services are cutting into it because people find it to be an acceptable substitute. Take away the substitute and you'll see bittorrent explode again.

>>131
Some parts of it probably will. Then again, actual pedos tend to be too dumb for these things. And if they use it, they'll find a way to deanonymize themselves anyways. Meanwhile political activists and curious citizens will be able to use it with competence to read history books that haven't been redacted and see the world through an unfiltered lens.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 21:56

>>132
some parts of it probably will

This is unacceptable, obviously

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 21:57

>>132
Look, you have ten lines before the post is truncated. Don't waste them on single-line paragraphs. Please help keep useless page requests to a minimum. Admin-kami pays by the kilobyte.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 22:18

>>132
Then again, actual pedos tend to be too dumb for these things.
Most of them are, but you might be surprised at how smart some of them are. There is very little solidarity though (except for the boyfuckers, who are pretty homogenous, but they are invariably very stupid (and gay)), and pedos tend to hate other pedos, so a coordinated spamming campaign is unlikely. But the fact of the matter remains that that one off post can send the operator to prison for several years at worst, and get all his equipment seized at best.

to read history books that haven't been redacted and see the world through an unfiltered lens.
I call bullshit. Who is writing this unfiltered lens? Just what the fuck are they afraid of? Tor is pretty anonymous, yet the only ``unredacted, unfiltered'' information you see is old copies of the anarchist cookbook. This shit doesn't make any sense. Who is suppressing all this information? What can't I say about history? And just where are these writers getting this ``unfiltered'' account? Were they first hand witnesses, waiting to write about it now? If the history books are so redacted and you can get in trouble for even reading it, how is there any second-hand research? In the west, the worst that could possibly happen is the schoolbooks get slanted to fit an agenda, but it isn't as if the ``true'' books have been burned. They're right there in the library, and you can go read them all you like, and even join a forum, use your driver's license as your avatar, and talk about it all you want without ever hearing anything from the law. What activism is being suppressed? I can go chain myself to a tree or picket an abortion clinic all I want. No one is bothering me.

Now, you're probably thinking that I'm viewing this from a first-world, liberal democracy point of view. That's true, because I am. The reasons are because 1) a government where the ``unfiltered'' history books are completely banned will just block the entire network and outlaw operating a server, 2) this will do them no good at all; revolutions are not won with shitty conspiracy theories: if you want to give power to the people, send them some guns, 3) I'm not wasting my resources to help sandniggers learn that the local warlord Mohamed Al Ahmed Abdula is abusing them. If they haven't figured that out by now, then they never fucking will. 4) Organization on an anonymous forum suffers from the inability to vet members by design. 90% would be flakes who never showed up, most of the rest will be plants and saboteurs, and the few who did show up would be shot on the spot. The internet organization of Arab Spring took place on social media because people were able to identify their real life friends, who they knew already would be receptive to the idea, and there was a greater emotional punishment to flaking out on a friend than some stranger you met on a secret internet club and talked about doing something with for twenty minutes.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 22:42

Maybe if we limit this thing to just text, then we wouldn't be so concerned about underage porn. Links wouldn't be as dangerous, as the actual pics would be hosted on another place. I guess someone could post base64 pics or whatever but we can also place a limit on long strings and also we have some sort of plausible deniability for that kind of shit.
You guys love textboards, right?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 22:51

>>136
A reasonable compromise for typical things, but for more serious matters, you need to have some sort of way to upload binaries (say, an archive of source code or a PDF document) unless you are willing to accept the risk of the user losing anonymity by clicking a trapped link outside the network.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 23:19

>>135
Who is suppressing all this information?
China, North Korea, Iran, Cuba, etc. They just can't handle you being able to look up https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989 . Even Russia is willing to block github because of ``suicide propaganda''. UK has ip bans to stop piracy, but we'll see what else they use it for in the near future. You aren't going to understand the purpose of this until you abandon your perspective that's fixed within a civilized country that respects these basic rights to information. And even with that, your safe havens may not last forever.

In the west,
There is a world outside the west you know.

Now, you're probably thinking that I'm viewing this from a first-world, liberal democracy point of view.
Yes, and you are being deliberately obtuse to avoid confronting the intended purpose of freenet, tor, etc, and the benefit it serves.

3) I'm not wasting my resources to help sandniggers learn that the local warlord Mohamed Al Ahmed Abdula is abusing them. If they haven't figured that out by now, then they never fucking will.
Everyone knows, but still facts are still useful. They deserve to be able to learn about the world outside of a propaganda bubble. If you don't want to help them that's fine. But if you get to call me a pedo-enabler I get to call you a third-world-oppression-enabler.

The internet organization of Arab Spring took place on social media because people were able to identify their real life friends
Many of whom were arrested and tortured.

>>136
But what about the video of standing-in-front-of-tank man?

>>137
If you want to contribute something, read up on what's been done first. The last thing we need is a hopelessly insecure reinvention of freenet that doesn't work.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-18 23:36

All along I've kept it to myself, because being Chinese I felt I shouldn't bad-mouth the Chinese. But I can't help thinking sometimes -- and I might as well say it -- you, the Chinese, you are not worth my struggle! You are not worth my sacrifice!

What we actually are hoping for is bloodshed, the moment when the government is ready to brazenly butcher the people. Only when the Square is awash with blood will the people of China open their eyes. Only then will they really be united. But how can I explain any of this to my fellow students?

"And what is truly sad is that some students, and famous well-connected people, are working hard to help the government, to prevent it from taking such measures. For the sake of their selfish interests and their private dealings they are trying to cause our movement to disintegrate and get us out of the Square before the government becomes so desperate that it takes action....

Interviewer: "Are you going to stay in the Square yourself?

Chai Ling: "No."

Interviewer: "Why?"

Chai Ling: "Because my situation is different. My name is on the government's blacklist. I'm not going to be destroyed by this government. I want to live. Anyway, that's how I feel about it. I don't know if people will say I'm selfish. I believe that people have to continue the work I have started. A democracy movement can't succeed with only one person. I hope you don't report what I've just said for the time being, okay?"

HAHAHA wtf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chai_Ling#Controversies

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 0:22

>>138
China, North Korea, Iran, Cuba[, and Russia]
China and Russia already watch everything at the ISP level. I don't know about China, but Russian ISP even have to pay for the privilege of filtering their internet. Are you planning on this distributed BBS being transferred in the unused bits of a fake requests (getting 0.3Kbps)? If not, then it will be just be protocol filtered. In NK, only party members have access to things like computers and food, and only Kim Jong Un himself has unfiltered access to the internet anyway. This is a country where the government only allows the sell of radios that can only receive preset frequencies and sends anyone who modifies them to the camps where children fight over who gets to eat the corn kernels they find in cow shit. Yeah, real fucking good this is going to do them. Iran shuts the internet off when they feel like it, and Cuba trades data with the Sneakernet, which is more distributed and trustworthy than anything you can come up with.
There is a world outside the west you know.
As I said, I do not care about them. It will not help them. The internet cannot fight a police state. Try all you want, but you'll just end up with something like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haystack_%28software%29 .
Yes, and you are being deliberately obtuse to avoid confronting the intended purpose of freenet, tor, etc, and the benefit it serves.
They are good for distributing controversial content, no doubt about that. But I won't delude myself into thinking that changing the world is what they're actually used for.
If you don't want to help them that's fine. But if you get to call me a pedo-enabler I get to call you a third-world-oppression-enabler.
I'm saying that it won't help them. I'm not concerned about enabling pedos, only saying that it will make everyone not want to operate a node. And call me a 3rd world oppression enabler all you want. I freely admitted that I don't care to helping them. More likely than not, they'll just install an even more brutal tyranny in place.
Many of whom were arrested and tortured.
To make an omelet, you have to break some eggs. Yes, when there is no avenue left for challenging the powers that be except violence, then violence it will have to be. Revolutions are bloody. There will be lots of death and torture before all is said and done. Did you think that Kim Jong was going to fire up FireFox, navigate to the board, and suddenly have a change of heart? Don't be stupid. They only way to get the crown off a king's head is to cut it off.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 0:24

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_dissidents
It's a little funny to see how minor their actions were.

I want to encounter some of these on the net. How funny would it be to actually talk to one?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenqing

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 1:54

>>141
one of them used to visit prog

his name started with an X and he smelled like shit

loved emacs lisp iirc

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 4:11

>>140
You can obfuscate traffic to make it look like other traffic that's allowed.

Bypassing censorship and providing free information to millions of people is a significant change to the world in itself.

Perhaps it will help them. Perhaps it wont. If they choose to take the risk of using it, it will be there.

You can communicate with friends without giving your names and everything you say to a government that's going to torture you for it.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 4:12

>>143
oh shut up

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 4:14

>>144
No! I am working on making my replies more terse though.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 7:33

I feel bad for derailing such a cute thread with politics. I was triggered by the typical anti-crypto-anarchy arguments, but I should have controlled myself. Continue talking about scheme freely...

(define list (lambda lambda lambda))

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:47

(define lambda (blabba blabba blabba))

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:48

>>146
whoa, how does that work?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:49

>>148
oh nvm

(define list (lambda args args))

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:49

>>149

(def list (lam args args))

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:49

>>146
here I was thinking you were doing some crazy witch-craft

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:52

but re-defining lambda, >>146, that's like raising a non-USA flag in the USA. I hope you think about what you've done here today, you sick fuck. I hope you think long and hard about it. I know I will be.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:56

>>146
the can of worms you opened up today will plague us Scheme programmers for eternity. it is an offence against the almighty lambda.

truly, I would be pleased if your appreciation for programming crumbled to dust over the next week, never to be experienced again. I cannot think of a more suitable punishment delivered by the Court of the Lambda.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 9:58

>>152
that's like raising a non-USA flag in the USA
You mean it's commonplace and acceptable?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 10:06

>>154
p much, so what's on for the weekend?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 15:43

>>146
I think it was all pretty genuinely interesting discussion and definitely relevant to the task at hand, so don't feel bad.

>>155
I hope to publish the hidden service for testing by the end of this weekend. Don't hold your breath or anything though

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 20:51

>>156
Too late holding it as we speak.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-19 21:21

RIP >>157-kun.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-21 1:57

I'm working on a GUI in Racket. This is what I have so far, it's pretty much shit though. I hope to make it a bit more polished soon. I can upload the code if anyone wants, otherwise I'll wait until it's "done".

https://i.imgur.com/Tbpfqdh.png

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-21 15:13

>>159
Oh dear. It's like one of those pre-web chat apps.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List