Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Is firefox a lost cause?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 20:41

The browser claims to pioneer open source yet implements DRM/EME

they've added a social media Hello! messenger thing to the browser itself, but that has nothing to do with web

now it just started including some weird "pocket" feature that's related to a cloud company in the source tree itself, not just as an addon

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 20:43

Is firefox a lost cause?
It almost always was. But even more after the 4.0 version.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 20:45

In recognition of Data Privacy Day, Ponemon Institute is pleased to announce the results of the 2014 Most Trusted Companies for Privacy Study, an annual study that tracks consumers’ rankings of organizations that collect and manage their personal information. This year, the most trusted company is Amazon.

The 10 Most Trusted Companies for 2014
Amazon
American Express
PayPal
Hewlett Packard
IBM
Nationwide
USAA
LinkedIn
Apple
USPS (tied)
Intuit (tied)
Mozilla

Why is a company trusted?
Now in its ninth year, the Most Trusted Companies for Privacy Study provides a list of overall top performing companies and federal agencies as well as those industries that are perceived to be most trusted for their privacy practices. What these companies have in common is a strong orientation to respecting their customers and providing the best possible customer service. In contrast, the study also finds that a poorly written and disclosed privacy policy can actually diminish trust.

In this study, we also ask consumers if the privacy of their personal information is important. While privacy is increasing in importance, consumers fear they are losing the ability to control the collection, use and sharing of their personal information.

How the study is conducted
Ponemon Institute’s Most Trusted Companies for Privacy Study is an objective study that asks consumers to name and rate organizations they believe are most committed to protecting the privacy of their personal information. This annual study tracks consumers’ rankings of organizations that collect and manage their personal information.

More than 100,000 adult-aged consumers were asked to name up to five companies they believe to be the most trusted for protecting the privacy of their personal information. Consumer responses were gathered using a continuous sampling concluding in October 2014 and resulted in a final sample of 7,791 respondents who, on average, provided 5.4 discernible company ratings that represent 25 different industries. The full report will be available next week on our website.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 20:46

"Remove from toolbar"

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 20:54

>>4
if I can't see it the problem doesn't exist

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 21:20

Yep, v4 was absolute shit and I stopped using it not long after.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 21:29

>>6
he uses chrome unironically

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 22:39

Too bad Cudder's browser will never be released, since Cudder is all talk and no action, unfortunately.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 23:03

>>8
dude fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 23:25

>>9
chill, cudder

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 23:31

>>10
dude fuck off

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-03 23:55

>>11
chill, cudder

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-04 0:16

now it just started including some weird "pocket" feature
wtf why??

Name: sage 2015-06-04 0:34

>>13
because cloud is the future!!!

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-04 1:27

>>7
I never said anyone here uses chrome, wtf?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-04 1:34

>>3
Amazon is horrible for privacy. Why the fuck is it at the top?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-04 1:36

>>16
Explain.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-04 2:40

Once your software project reaches peak SJW, it's doomed. Farewell Firefox. Farewell Mozilla.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-04 2:51

>>17
Don't tell me what to do!

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-04 8:11

>>18
Whenever you reach peak X, X will steadily decline afterwards.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-05 20:47

Bug 1172126 - Remove Pocket integration
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172126

Name: sage 2015-06-05 22:15

If I'm not wrong, Pocket can be disabled with the customizable UI (hamburger menu -> customize, drag the icon out)

If i can't see a problem it doesn't exist!

Name: sage 2015-06-05 22:17

How to remove pocket and reader:

rm -r ./browser/components/pocket/
rm -r ./toolkit/components/reader/
rm -r ./browser/components/readinglist/

edited: /toolkit/components/moz.build
edited: /browser/components/moz.build

edited: browser/base/content/tab-content.js
edited: browser/base/content/nsContextMenu.js
edited: browser/base/content/urlbarBindings.xml
edited: browser/base/content/browser.js
edited: browser/base/content/browser-sets.inc
edited: browser/base/content/browser.xul

edited: browser/components/nsBrowserGlue.js
edited: browser/modules/moz.build

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-06 5:57

>>21
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
keikaku doori

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-08 0:45

When I use a web browser, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless messaging and data collection plugins! I just want a BROWSER!! Not a "pocketor". Not a "hello-or". Those aren't even WORDS!!!!! FIREFOX! FIREFOX! FIREFOX IS THE STANDARD!!!

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-08 1:37

When I use a web browser, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless javascript and css plugins! I just want a BROWSER!! Not a "webkitor". Not a "geckoer". Those aren't even WORDS!!!!! ELINKS! ELINKS! ELINKS IS THE STANDARD!!!

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-08 2:51

I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless ...
hahaha totally something cudder would say

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 17:49

Revenue-impacting Changes

Effective as of Firefox 38

Firefox has a number of features that have revenue-bearing components, generally in the form of partnerships or paid placements. These features include Search, Tiles, and other potential features. Except where otherwise agreed under a formal custom distribution agreement, no changes shall be permitted that negatively impact the revenue potential of these features. This includes changes that would be otherwise permitted within the scope of an add-on under the AMO policy.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 17:54

>>28
That's for partners, don't start quoting out of context now.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 18:13

The historians can't seem to settle whether to call this one "The Third Browser War" (or the "Fourth"), or whether "The First JavaScript War" fits it better. We just call it "The Chrome War" if we call it anything...

- Anonymous Mozillian

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 18:25

Is now Firefox considered "adware"?

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 19:13

>>33
Dubs confirm it! Your post is true.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 19:15

no its not

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 19:17

>>32,33
Paradox!

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-09 19:33

>>34
(p → q /\ q → ¬p) → (p → ¬p) → _|_ → ¬p

That last bit can be read ">>32 is butts and therefore wrong."

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-11 4:34

>>35
butts
gb2tumblrsjwscum

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-11 16:51

>>36
You seem triggered.

Name: DR MEME 2015-06-11 17:08

DRM/EME

DR MEME HAHAHAHAHAH

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List