Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

GHC compiler is extremely slow

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-14 16:41

The relatively simple expression
begin push 1 push 2 push 3 push 4 push 5 push 6 push 7 push 8 push 9 push 10
add add add add add add add add add end
takes 5.6 seconds to compile (with no optimizations). Adding one more push 11 and one more add blows the GHC compilation time to 19.2 seconds, the 3-time increase

Wow adding up 10 numbers can take 20 seconds? I though haskell was supposed to be efficient

Name: sage 2015-06-14 16:58

      ___
     く/',二二ヽ>
     |l |ノノイハ))
      |l§゚ ー゚ノ§
     ノl( ||水リ).|
    只 く/_|〉 只
.   ミ  し'ノ  ミ

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-14 18:12

Show us your code, faggot. Or, better yet, profiler's output.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-14 19:42

Haskell (GHC) is efficient, you can't solve an NP problem in P time.

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2015-06-15 6:03

Haskell is a bloated mess.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-15 23:19

>>5
You're mom is a bloated mess.

Name: Anonymous 2015-06-17 19:33

>>6
Bloated mess your anus, DOG

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List