Why is R5RS considered to be good

... when it includes ZERO functionality for a filter function or a fold function? Pathetic.

R6RS was a smart move. Too bad that ivory-tower academics felt it was too useful.

>>5
r7rs exists! i'm using it a bunch and various compilers implement it.

I have some issues with it and see room for improvement. Want to make my own version

>>6
does anyone else think "large" doesn't need to exist? what's wrong with SRFIs?

>>7
/g/ and lainchan are over there -->