Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

reddit censorship about cocks

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-23 12:39

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-23 15:21

>>4
>implying that the cancer is only using its freedoms, and/or only criticized for using its freedoms
>2015
>being this naïve

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-23 15:48

>>5
But they are. Which part of this situation is not them simply using their freedoms? Only their intentions/views? Oh wait, restricting someone's freedom because you don't like what they are using it is the opposite of supporting freedom.

Anyone can tolerate people doing something he approves of, it's only by the reaction to someone exercising their freedoms in a way that you personally disagree with one can tell if you're sincere or full of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-23 15:51

>>6
The SJW cancer are using their freedoms in order to restrict others' use of theirs. That's to say: to enforce a pious silence on pain of retributive consequence.

Their opponents aren't.

And that, you'll find, makes all the operational difference.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-23 16:00

>>5
EPIC!

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-23 16:10

>>7
The SJW cancer are using their freedoms in order to restrict others' use of theirs. That's to say: to enforce a pious silence on pain of retributive consequence.

You don't have the freedom to camp in someone's house and keep calling them a faggot. That is not your freedom. That can't be your freedom because it interferes with the owner's freedom to not have an obnoxious faggot in his house. Which is definitely a proper freedom since it's his house, not yours.

So, since that's not and never was a freedom of yours, showing you the door is not restricting your freedom. It's just them using their freedoms, yes.

Name: Anonymous 2015-07-23 16:16

>>7
That's to say: to enforce a pious silence on pain of retributive consequence.

"Retributive consequence" here means that they are going to use their freedom of speech inform other people who don't like bigots that you're a bigot and those other people would exercise their freedom of association to not associate with you.

Of course that would inconvenience you. Willing to trample all over people's freedoms if they inconvenience you makes you an enemy of the freedom and a big fat hypocrite.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List