Fucking Haskell

Why doesn't Haskell excite me as much as Common Lisp did? CL is such a big sweet language with all sorts of cool shit in in. Haskell in comparison seems minimal and I wonder if I'm missing out because I don't understand the magic of types or w/e.

>>19
It is possible to write the type using GADTs and DataKinds, but some functions (e.g. filter) can't be typed as easily as in a language with fully-dependent types.