[LISP] [Web] Let's work on the new Lispweb! [Standard]
Name:
Anonymous2015-08-17 1:10
We're all sick of dealing with the verbosity of XML/SGML based languages, the inconsistency of CSS and the overall badness of Javashit. Transcompiling to any of these languages is just a half-assed try at sugarcoating a turd.
Post your ideas for syntax/semantic rules, document structure, protocols, rendering techniques or anything relevant to the topic.
Hopefully we will be able to create a basic clone of /prog/ using the newly designed languages. No need to work on retarded features like animations or ``single page applications'' because this project is aimed exclusively at EXPERT PROGRAMMERS.
Such fleeting improvements are usually looks in practical form, like different programming paradigms described as "powerful" (easy to use for some) and supposedly cleaner operating systems. It's like humans evolving unusually sexy bodies. It would be cool if we kept them, but we don't need them. We live in ad-hoc hives, eat the flesh of enslaved lifeforms, and become sexually aroused upon viewing vague arrangements of triangles.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-27 14:08
>>164 This is the most autistic post I have ever read.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-27 18:19
We live in ad-hoc hives, eat the flesh of enslaved lifeforms, and become sexually aroused upon viewing vague arrangements of triangles.
It was all fun and games until the last one. I think >>164 tried to pretend to be an autist in a too obvious fashion so that everyone would think that xe's only pretending, but kinda gave xirself out with that one.
It's like as if someone tried to make a social commentary as if from a viewpoint of an alien, "they are made out of meat" style, but slipped up exposing xirself as an actual alien.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-27 18:30
We live in ad-hoc hives, eat the flesh of enslaved lifeforms, and become sexually aroused upon viewing vague arrangements of triangles.
It was all fun and games until the last one. I think >>164 tried to pretend to be an autist in a too obvious fashion so that everyone would think that he's only pretending, but kinda gave himself out with that one.
It's like as if someone tried to make a social commentary as if from a viewpoint of an alien, "they are made out of meat" style, but slipped up exposing himself as an actual alien.
>>170 It's not about pronouns, it's about resisting the feminist cancer.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-27 19:45
>>171 I see. You're the only thing standing strong protecting the world from the literally dozens of neon-haired idiots saying dumb things on twitter, by saying mean things to them. I thank you for your service, o keyboard warrior, your valor will not be forgotten!
>>172 I don't even go to Twatter, you moron. I go to prog and when I'm on prog, I don't want to read text contaminated by feminist dirt. That's why I've posted the corrected version.
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-28 21:47
>>176 you better get on there then, a whole community is going undefended from feminazis
only you can help save twitter from this scourge
Name:
Anonymous2015-09-28 22:26
>>177 But first you must ask, is twitter worth saving?
JavaScript is Indians shitting in the streets, but Lispweb is kikes shitting in your mouth.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-28 19:46
>>184 Please elaborate, I have a Jewish scat fetish.
Name:
Anonymous2016-03-28 22:17
The human, typable textual format of the tag encoding is needless bullshit that holds this back. Allocate some Unicode control characters for begin & end tag, and have Ctrl-[ and Ctrl-] in your editor delineate your tags and output the proper control character. Ain't nobody got time for worrying about which internal characters to escape because you're trying to keep to the typewriter characters for both content and delineation.