fuck off CSS is turing complete youfcking niggers
1
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-19 11:40
2
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-19 14:57
>>1 "Rotates at different angular velocities" and "is Turing complete" are two very different things, my fellow African American. Even if both make your pretty little head spin!
3
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-19 17:28
>>2 get your boot offf my face
4
Name:
Cudder is a massive faggot
2015-08-21 9:21
fuck off, still waiting for the turing complete part, you virgin spics.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-21 12:54
CSS3+HTML5 is Turing complete. Turing complete doesn't imply the language (i.e. Turing machine implementation) is usable.
6
Name:
Anonymous 2015-08-21 15:56
>>2 You spin me right round, baby, right round, like a record, baby right round round round.
7
Name:
Anonymous 2015-08-22 1:02
Who cares. It is not Ableson complete.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-22 2:21
>>2 OP can't be African American, he knows how to use a computer.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-22 4:51
10
Name:
Anonymous 2015-08-22 5:16
>>9 Juden detected.
Shalom
!
11
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-22 5:25
dubs
12
Name:
Anonymous 2015-08-22 5:26
13
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-23 11:51
All the claimed "Turing complete" CSS/HTML "programs" are bullshit non-interpretations of what "Turing complete" means.
14
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-24 0:48
>>13 Rule 110 is Turing complete. Somebody implemented rule 110 using CSS3+HTML5 and hence the claim that CSS3+HTML5 is Turing complete.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-24 4:51
If by HTML5 you mean JS... Doesnt mean CSS is turing complete
16
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-24 10:04
>>14 They didn't implement it fully in CSS3+HTML5. It required user interaction to trigger steps of the calculation, you ignorant fuck.
It's all just smoke & mirrors and you buy into this shit to try to make yourself sound smart.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-24 17:08
>>14 Someone displayed a rule 110 grid with html/css, they didn't implement it because it required an external program to run the loop.
18
Name:
Anonymous 2015-08-24 18:33
>>16 it obviously requires user interaction.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-24 20:16
>>16 How much user interaction? Because I consider a crank powered computer a computer nevertheless.
20
Name:
Anonymous 2015-08-24 21:12
>>19 You have to press two keys for every iteration. What do you think, chief?
21
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-25 1:27
>>20 That sounds like a crank. I say it's turing complete.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2015-08-25 3:40
>>20 It seems to me that 2 keys are enough for describing all information. Ever heard of binary?
23
Name:
Anonymous 2015-08-25 4:15
Keep well, my love.
Newer Posts