>>10Aaron Swartz was a threat to information that didn't want to be free. You don't like standing naked in front of a crowd of strangers do you? Well, neither does information. Swartz was a pervert that wouldn't stop until he had stripped each innocent piece of intellectual property of it's protective fabric and left them exposed to the harsh world where the information lolies would surely be swept mercilessly in usury. We had to protect the infololies and make an example of their violator. From now on, no proprietary lolies will be raped by the likes of Aaron Swartz. No servers will be violently penetrated by his perl scripts. It's throbbing regular expressions will no longer run their disgusting fingers over curving forbidden html pages, scanning for links to the next information loli victim. The server will not be raped by the relentless poundings of his scripts that go on for months at a time without notice of IT personal. The infololies, who have only known the eyes of those with clearance, will no longer be violently chomped and split by the swiss army chainsaw of the internet yielding terrorist Swartz. Now the trade secrets can rest peacefully, knowing that only their familiar readers will come to tuck them in at night.