>>47"Landin's paper was about interpreting the goto in Algol 60 in lambda calculus"
becomes "Landin was an academic trying to justify goto by pretending it was somehow justified inside lambda calculus by moving the goal posts and pretending that somehow gotos could become the emperor in new clothes by renaming them to continuations. All this beating around the bush really meant, that functional programmer were envious of imperative languages so they needed to implement imperative programming into functional programming while pretending that it was still functional."
Wikipedia: "Continuations are the functional expression of the GOTO statement"
that's exactly what they ARE. Bad post.