If lithp macros are so cool ...

how the fuck do I use define-syntax and syntax-rules to convert "abc" into (string->list "abc") ?

ANSWER ME THAT, MATH BOYS

>>14
You can't have implicit macros that match on reader literals without using something implementation-specific e.g. altering the readtable, and at that point it's not lisp or scheme any more, it's a new language you may describe as "lisp/scheme + your retarded string nuking macro and a bunch of useless string- functions".

you can very easily convert "abc" to (string->list "abc") using a reader macro, you stupid fucks.