>shitcunts who don't release source

* muh code is not le pretty enough yet. its soo messy :-)

* I just gotta rewrite it neatily and nice and fix all the bugs then il open sources it maybe :)

* the code isn't useful to anyone!

* I just need to check there's not passwords saved in the first xD

I'm a professional project saboteur. I get paid the big bux by billionare businesses to make sure open source projects die. How do I accomplish this avaricious action for the adversaries of open algorithms? Well, by being an EXPERT ^_ENTERPRISE PROGRAMMER. I make cherished contributions cooly chosen over that of whatever dumb dweeb does on his down time days. Then after a few months or years, we inevitably have a little feud over the future of his favorite features and I fork the fucker. But since I do this for a living, I have much more time to tithe to the tedious tasks than they do. I gather a great group of geek groupies around me that play on popularity but program poorly. I bolster the bustling base by being a brisk benefactor and being at their beck and call. Eventually, the era of earlier entity is entirely erased from everyone's memory. At long last, I relinquish the reigns to some retarded retainer who should be refused reproduction. The project may be in it's death throes for decades as developers dick around, but it's definitely dying. The complexity caused by cautionlessly cultivating crappy code contributes to a culmination of a complete concentration on, and credence in, celebrity and cynosure over the conventional competence. A classical constitutional collapse cleanly concluded.