>shitcunts who don't release source

* muh code is not le pretty enough yet. its soo messy :-)

* I just gotta rewrite it neatily and nice and fix all the bugs then il open sources it maybe :)

* the code isn't useful to anyone!

* I just need to check there's not passwords saved in the first xD

>>23
why should only coders have the privileged of source code?

I don't think you understand software freedom.

>>24
Because only coders produce software in the first place.

You'll notice I also said "obviously have no interest in using." If I release a software-defined goat tussler, amateur stallmen will crawl out of the woodwork to ask for the source for it even if they don't have any goats or even know what it's used for.

Those are the ones who really get my goat.