Greenspun's redundancy
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-12 13:41
Common Lisp is already ``ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, [and] slow''.
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-13 16:18
1/10. I would give a 0/10, but I'd rather leave a rational.
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-13 16:34
e2/ħc
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-13 18:03
0/10 is rational
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-13 20:28
>>40/10 is infinitesimal, you baka
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-13 22:23
CL-USER> (type-of 0/10)
BIT
CL-USER> (type-of 1/10)
RATIO
rekt
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-13 22:42
Welcome to Racket v6.2.1.
-> (require typed/racket)
-> 0/10
- : Integer [more precisely: Zero]
0
-> 1/10
- : Exact-Rational [more precisely: Positive-Exact-Rational]
1/10
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-14 2:46
Welcome to Satori Lisp v1.3.37.
-> (require typed/satori)
-> 0/10
- : Integer [more precisely: Zero]
0
-> 1/10
- : Exact-Rational [more precisely: One Tenth]
1/10
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-14 10:43
Welcome to /prog/ vAnus.-> (require typed/fibs hma/meme-fan)
-> 0/10
- : Integer [more precisely: Value-of->>1]
0
-> 1/10
- : Exact-Rational [more precisely: Positive-Fractional-Dubs]
1/10
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-15 13:19
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-16 19:40
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-17 11:11
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-17 19:32
>>12thanks, nice timestamp quads
Name:
Anonymous
2015-11-17 20:07
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-15 19:05
>>50/10 can be expressed as a ratio of integers, therefore it is rational.
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-15 23:48
Check em
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 1:34
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 1:54
What programming language is this?
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 2:44
Check em
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 2:53
Check em
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 3:42
Check em
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 3:45
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 5:13
>>1,3-5,10-21Do you even Lisp, bro?
Name:
Anonymous
2016-06-16 6:02
What dank meme is this?
Newer Posts