Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

McCarthy predicted cloud computing in 1961

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 14:37

http://www.technologyreview.com/news/425623/the-cloud-imperative/

“Computing may someday be organized as a public utility just as the telephone system is a public utility,” Professor John McCarthy said at MIT’s centennial celebration in 1961. “Each subscriber needs to pay only for the capacity he actually uses, but he has access to all programming languages characteristic of a very large system … Certain subscribers might offer service to other subscribers … The computer utility could become the basis of a new and important industry.”

So it can't be that bad hein?

And this is the guy who invented Lisp!

Do you want more interesting reads? Try this page http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/index.html

It talks about solving global warming. Take that, COP21! Take that, Al Gore!

hahahah

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 14:37

"He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense." - John McCarthy

another hero for the ages up there with Terry Davis

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 14:39

in 2012 I collaborated briefly with the Terry and we got the newline character in Losethos changed ;)

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 14:40

I already sent a missive based on the progress page to the local newspapers here in Canada.

``That's business with .NET'', he proclaimed as a matter of prestige.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 18:54

There's nothing wrong with ``cloud computing,'' or HaaS. It's SaaS that's harmful.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:02

Haskell as a Service?

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:11

>>5
``Cloud computing'', the concept formerly known as ``grid computing'' and prior to that, ``timesharing'', is an enterprise-enabled marketing bullshite buzzword for the ability of a single machine to accomodate an n>1 number of users -- an ability that computers have had almost since Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:12

>>7
I told >>5 but actually I should have told the entire thread.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:13

>>6
Hardware.

Purchasing CPU time or HD space is fine with me, at least in principle.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:16

>>7
Yes, I know. I hate the phrase as well, but I don't issue with someone with an expensive and powerful computer charging others to run programs on that computer.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:17

>>10
s/don't issue/don't see an issue/

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:27

>>9
That's called a mainframe.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 19:41

>>12
What is it with you and your ancient terminology? Get with the times, gramps!

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 21:38

>>10
SaaS and ``cloud'' storage are the only things the general populous understands to be ``The Cloud'', which is why ``The Cloud'' should be considered harmful. HaaS is not de facto ``cloud''.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 21:44

>>14
I elaborate: in the same way that ``beg the question'' has -- for all intents and purposes -- lost its original meaning, so too has ``The Cloud'' no other meaning than the nominal aether whereupon Dropbox and Office 365 exist.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 22:10

For all intensive purposes.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 22:25

>>14
the general populous

Incorrect use of ``populous,'' use ``population'' instead.

My point was the phenomenon that McCarthy predicted doesn't encompass all of the elements ``cloud computing,'' particularly the elements that make ``cloud computing'' an unappealing phrase to many people on /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 23:22

aws lambda

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-20 23:51

Cloud computing is simply a networked computer system with servers and clients.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-21 10:19

>>7
You forgot "utility computing", which I feel is the most accurate.

>>19
Bingo.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-21 10:21

EVERYBODY predicted "cloud" computing, especially those from the era where machines were room-sized and everybody used fucking terminals to access remote computing resources!

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-21 11:22

>>1
predict these dubz

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-22 19:08

>>22
nice ducks

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-22 21:27

>>19
The less you care about the underlying details, the more 'cloudy' it is. An Amazon® EC2™ instance is cloudy because you don't care about the location or health of the physical machine it is hosted on. AWS™ λ™ and Amazon® RDS™ are more cloudy, because you just get the service you want without worrying about scaling or storage or OS. It is truly a 'cloud' you can draw in your diagrams with no more detail desirable or possible.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-23 0:54

Third world problems

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-23 5:09

>>24
I go to 1990s era hotmail.com. I don't know or care which server or how many servers are involved with the request. It's a "cloud email" provider for the modern usage of the term, with nothing to do with whether it's individual servers or something AWS SQS-ish or whatever.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-23 15:05

>>26
Yes, exactly. Google® Gmail™ and the likes are cloud services, one of the first most ordinary people used, as opposed to the manually set up dedicated servers businesses of the time used, where you may even be told `̀we've moved half our users to another server for disk space, please update your mail client configuration´́.

Name: Anonymous 2015-12-23 16:52

What are you talking about? Hotmail was the first "cloud email service" most ordinary people used, and that was at least a decade before the term "cloud" formed in PHB's vacuous heads.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-07 1:13

The notion of "hardware as a service" was the DEFAULT vision of the future of computing back in those days, based on the mainframe and terminal model then in use, and it's what science fiction authors generally predicted. We actually moved away from that prediction when we started to use personal computers, but now we're returning to it again (though often rather than a single mainframe or server, we have "distributed computing" with multiple computers working together on a single task).

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-07 8:08

The notion of "hardanal as a service" was the DEFAULT vision of the future of prostitution back in those days, based on the penis and anus model then in use, and it's what science fiction authors generally predicted. We actually moved away from that prediction when we started to use personal dildos, but now we're returning to it again (though often rather than a single dom or bottom, we have "distributed buttfucking" with multiple peni fucking together on a single anus).

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List