The Lisp Paradox

Inferior tools allow less intelligent people to create what those with greater intelligence are unable to create with Lisp.

What does this paradox mean?

Are people who choose to use Lisp actually less intelligent than people who use other languages? Is Lisp actually inferior to and less productive than these other languages? Do the few people who are able to accomplish something in Lisp actually choose it for bragging rights, the way handicaps are used in sports?

Why do people put assembly language and Lisp in the same category of difficult languages? Shouldn't the high productivity of Lisp make it one of the easy languages, like Visual Basic, Python, PHP, and JavaScript? Why is it considered a difficult accomplishment to create something useful in Lisp?

>>51

If it's open source, sure.

So, no.

the authors hide this fact from everyone

More people are interested in writing code for money than bragging about the language they use to write code.

Are you like 15? _{^{etc etc I am a fag}}

DESKTOP software; are you deaf? You change the subject every tıme they are fuckıng you.

Pretty sure the only reason people are put off lisp is loud-mouthed bellends like you screaming about how shit it is and that you shouldn't write code in it because nobody writes code in it.