>>1I'll humour you for a moment.
There is nothing there to disprove. Its such a nothing, that even trying to *describe* mentishit's "work" can seem cruel.
This is what his code looks like, and what all his spam boils down to if you actually read it:
// Mentishit's Complete Artificial Electronic Sentience implementation
i = 1; // The concept enters the sensorium
print i; // The AI communicates its thoughts
// Refer to page xxx in the how2perl manual for how to make forward declarations.
That's literally all there is. He is someone who never attained any fluency in any programming language, who upon declaring a 2D array claims to have discovered electronic sentience. Even pointing this out here seems rude and unseemly, like making fun of a mentally disabled kid. Except in this case the "kid" is well past middle age and never got the help he needed.
Trying to describe mentishit is like trying to describe a fart in the wind. There is nothing really there, but its still vaguely unpleasant and obnoxious. Mentishit is part of the rich
diverse tapestry of shitposters here on
/prog/ that are guaranteed to derail threads and shit up the board on cue.