Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

C programming language ASMR

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 0:33

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 2:55

Take your transjewish propaganda and gtfo.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 12:18

Allahu Crapbar! I just had an explosive diarrhea.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 14:01

Why didn't she use puts? She instead uses printf incorrectly.
Some of the things she says seem to be a bit wrong, for example "it is possible to access memory outside of the defined-size of the array", no it is not, this is undefined behaviour.

"it is important to also initalise it on the same time"
So you will get bugs with the same behaviour that are difficult to detect instead of the compiler warning you or bugs with different behaviour each time?
It reminds me when people do try{code}catch{} just to avoid crashes without avoiding what causes them.

"possibly a valid address in memory or maybe an invalid one, which would cause undefined behavior"
False, it is always valid.

This is a bad video, in fact, why is it even a video? Why isn't it a simple webpage? It would make our life easier that way. Not to mention that she is using a terrible, non-free editor to begin with.

Please, avoid posting low quality stuff such as this, thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 15:27

Ugh, hearing such a breathy and lip-smacking voice in my ear is the most irritating thing ever. Fuckers trying to cash in on the latest bullshit fad, without even the talent or a clue as to pull off the bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 23:25

>>5
Lip-smacking is insanely irritating. It's hard to fathom how there are niggers out there who legitimately enjoy this shit as a fetish.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 23:51

I happen to like soft talking, and programming

Why not both together?

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-07 8:09

I prefer soft farting.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-07 23:19

>>4
"it is possible to access memory outside of the defined-size of the array", no it is not, this is undefined behaviour.
This is kind of a pedantic objection. Her point was obvious: the runtime doesn't perform any bounds checking.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-08 0:04

>>9
Silly woman, not knowing about C pointer-array duality.

She's the highschool teacher who'd give you F for p[-1], even if p pointed into the middle of an array.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-08 8:33

>>10
Check 'em

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-08 12:17

>>9
Runtime bounds checking is gay anyway. Just use Haskell/dependently typed languages and check all array bounds at compile-time.

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-08 21:07

>>9
What if it does? Or what if it happens at runtime instead?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List