Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

circular shift

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 7:01

why don't most high level programming languages have a circular bitwise shift instructions given that most of the processors have it? why do I have to write a stupid one-liner that isn't guaranteed to be portable to have a compiler convert it to a single assembler instruction? it should be the other way around: write a single instruction and if processor doesn't support it, the compiler would convert it to an assembly workaround.

I know it's minor shit but that's also why there's no excuse for that

Name: Anonymous 2016-05-06 12:48

>>9
try handling binary protocols without them. or writing crypto code. inb4 use assembler for thar

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List