Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Full Stack Javascript

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-08 3:28

Try it /prog/lodites. It pays very well

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-08 3:46

function(function(function(...

Name: Neuromancer 2016-06-08 12:26

http://ai.neocities.org/DiaGram.html
/^^^^^^^^^\ Unrecognized Words Are New Concepts /^^^^^^^^^\
/ EYE \ _____ / EAR \
/ \ CONCEPTS /New- \ / \
| _______ | | | | _____ (Concept)--|-------------\ |
| /old \ | | | | /Old- \ \_____/ | Audition | |
| / image \---|-----+ | (Concept)----|-------|----------\ | |
| \ recog / | a| | | \_____/-----|-------|-------\ | | |
| \_______/ | b|C| | |______| | c | | | |
| | s|O|f| /EnParser\ | a | | | |
| visual | t|N|i| \________/ | t | | | |
| memory | r|C|b| ________|______ | s-/ | | |
| channel | a|E|e| / \ | e | | |
| | c|P|r| ( InStantiate ) | a | | |
| _______ | t|T|s| \_______________/ | t-----/ | |
| /new \ | |_|_| / _____ _____ | f | |
| / percept \ | / \/ / En \ / En \ | i | |
| \ engram /---|--\ Psi /-/ Nouns \--/ Verbs \ | s | |
| \_______/ | \___/ \_______/ \_______/ | h-------/ |

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-08 14:59

>>3
are u a wizzard??

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-08 15:15

Full stack my anus

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-08 19:07

>>2
You can use promises and async/await patterns to reduce the number of nested callbacks.

You can also use the arrow-function syntax if you have something against the "function" keyword.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-08 19:25

>>6
You can not use Javashit.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 0:10

Fuckstick Javascript

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 0:41

There is no single programming language that has caused me as much pain as Javashit. Dare I say even PHP was more enjoyable and bug-free.

Name: Dubsmate 2016-06-09 0:52

>>11, captain, dubs ahead!

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 1:01

JavaScript is essentially a less uptight version of C.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 5:14

>>11
less uptight
Codeword for WHORE.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 5:18

>>9
Javascript isn't a programming language

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 11:30

>>13
It is Turing complete and can have its source code stored in plain text format, therefore it is a programming language.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 12:13

>>14
But how does it smell?

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 14:17

>>15
Like Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 14:40

YOU HAVE BEEN VISITED BY LE CUDDER OF ALL TALK AND NO ACTIONS

COOL STORIES ABOUT GREAT PROJECTS WILL COME TO YOU BUT YOU WILL NEVER HAVE TO ACTUALLY DO ANY WORK

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-09 17:13

>>17
The stories aren't even cool. They're just piles of irritation and deck chair shuffling.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 3:55

>>11
What? Javascript is dynamically typed, has automatic memory management, and sits around in an event loop waiting for messages to be added to the message queue. C is literally the opposite of all those things. Aside from the syntax, the two languages could not be more different.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 4:07

>>19
JavaScript is a dialect of Common Lisp. The names even sound similar.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 4:36

>>20
That is actually true. JavaScript was designed using Common Lisp as base. But the guy behind JS was retarded and omitted the best parts of CL, like lexical environment and strong typing.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 4:38

>>21
But the guy behind JS was retarded and omitted the best parts of CL, like S-expressions.

FTFY

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 6:23

Brendan Eich was told to make ECMAScript "look like Java" because OOP was the happening thing in the 90s. It wasn't his fault that there are curly brackets and semicolons everywhere. Were it up to him, we'd have had Scheme for the browser from the start.

Ironically, WebAssembly is written entirely in S-expressions, but no one (in his right mind) will ever program in it.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 6:58

>>23
Leonard was a very promising C++ coder, three years out of college, with a solid work history and an impressive skill set He proved on the phone screen that he was above-average technically, and so he was invited in for an interview We needed a savvy C++ person to work on a piece of middleware that interfaced with our database, and Leonard seemed like a sure fit.

However, once we started talking to him, things went south in a hurry He spent most of the interview criticizing every tool and platform that we questioned him on We used SQL Server as our database? Puhleease We were planning to switch to Oracle soon, right? What’s that? Our team used Tool A to do all our coding in? Unacceptable He used Tool B, and only Tool B, and after he was hired, we'd all have to switch to Tool B And we'd have to switch to Java, because he really wanted to work with Java, despite the fact that 75 percent of the codebase would have to be rewritten We'd thank him later And oh, by the way, he wouldn’t be making any meetings before ten o'clock

Needless to say, we encouraged Leonard to seek opportunities elsewhere It wasn’t that his ideas were bad – in fact, he was “technically” right about many things, and his (strong) opin- ions were all backed with solid fact and sound reason (except for the ten o'clock thing – we think he may have just been making a“power play”) But it was obvious that, if hired, Leonard wasn’t going to play well with others – he would have been toxic kryptonite for team chemistry He actually managed to offend two of the team members during the forty-five minutes of his interview Leonard also made the mistake of assuming that Code Purity and Algorithm Beauty were always more important than a business deadline.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 9:53

>>21
strong typing
*strong dynamic checking

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 9:53

>>24
Leonard is a cocksucker's name, but he has his place on the team other than on his knees. If people like that didn't exist, idiot middle managers would keep choosing COBOL for new projects because it's what the team works best with.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 9:57

I love NodeJS

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 14:40

>>27
You should see a doctor for that. Or eat a bullet.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-10 15:08

>>28
see my anus

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 3:38

>>28
There's absolutely nothing wrong with full stack Javascript.

What better alternative do you suggest? PHP? Java? LOL!

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 4:03

This used to be called a Lisp machine.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-11 5:12

>>30
Full stack Java

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-13 4:40

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-13 19:44

Consider this: With Node-Webkit you can write desktop applications in Javascript and HTML that feel native, and have full access to every part of the operating system.

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-13 21:23

>>34
What is NAMBLA?

Name: Anonymous 2016-06-14 1:38


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List