Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Is your documentation ableist, sexist or over-privileged?

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-27 15:05

https://github.com/wooorm/retext-equality

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-27 15:56

I AM NOT AUTISTIC!

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-27 17:13

lol

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 6:25

even putting the SJW bullshit aside, this is retarded

`bipolar` may be insensitive, use `fluctuating`, `person with schizophrenia`, `person with bipolar disorder` instead'

bipolar disorder and schizophrenia aren't the same you dumb fucks

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 10:48

JACKSON FIVE GET

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 10:55

>>4
So instead of saying "our planet is magnetially bipolar" we should say "our planet is magnetically person with schizophrenia"?

Name: Cudder !cXCudderUE 2016-09-28 11:20

Might as well call it the "newspeakifier"...

>>6
Clbuttic!

Name: XML is Turing complete 2016-09-28 11:42

>>6
"Magnetically bipolar" doesn't even make sense. It's expected that a magnet has two poles, so saying "magnetically bipolar" is like saying "four-legged cat".

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 12:23

*grabs nonzero magnetically divergent dick*

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 13:52

>>8
Cats can be 0-N legged, ableist shitlord. Four-legged cats are just the expectation propagating four-normative legism in feline community.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 14:10

check'em

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 14:26

>>10
Cats can be 0-N legged
Four-legged cats are just the expectation
Exactly my point. "Four-legged cat" is superfluous specifically because "cat" implies "four-legged", if the cat in question does not have four legs, then that should be specifically stated.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 15:28

"cat" implies "four-legged"
Cat doesn't imply "four-legged", thats four-normative legism you ableist shitlord. All N-legged cats are equal.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 15:35

>>13
What about fractional-legged cats?

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 15:38

>>14
You are assuming N implies integer. It does not. Thats integer prejudice in you. All N numbers are equal and deserve their part(N could be fractional,rational,imaginary or complex, or even have its own gender).
I'm not going to educate you. Google "Math is racist" and learn for yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:16

>>8
No it's not:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupole_magnet

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:39

>>16
Even the article admits that it's not actually talking about magnets with four poles, but rather an arrangement of multiple magnets.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:42

>>17
Guess what, a planet's magnetic field isn't created by a single magnet either. It's even more complex than an arrangement of 4 magnets, thus cannot reasonably be "expected" to be bipolar.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:49

>>18
It's common knowledge that the Earth has precisely two magnetic poles.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 19:09

>>19
Yes, but it is not to be "expected" and the mechanism causing the geomagnetical field is still not fully understood, thus the statement about the Earth being magnetically bipolar is far from trivial. It could have been quadrupolar or non-magnetical just as well.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 19:19

>>20
It is "to be expected" because although the Earth's magnetic field consists of multiple "magnets", they are arranged in a way that they behave as a single one. Quadrupolarity requires a very specific arrangement of multiple magnets.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 19:22

>>21
It is not "to be expected" because no one has seen these "magnets", no one knows their size and composition, and no one knows the way they're arranged.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 19:24

>>22
Yes, but everyone is taught from a young age that Earth has two magnetic poles. By your logic, it's unreasonable to expect water to be wet if you don't know the subatomic structure of dihydrogen monoxide.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 20:08

>>23
And so that phrase would be untrivial at least in that context (teaching people at young age). It is also untrivial in the context of teaching physics undergrads because that is a scientific fact. As for your analogy, it is flawed because the wetness of water is a fact apprehended directly by the senses, unlike the geomagnetic field.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 20:18

>>24
Ha, get a load of this guy! Probably needs a compass to tell which way is north.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 20:48

>>25
In fact, I can't even tell which way is north with a compass because I know that magnetic poles don't coincide with rotationary poles.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-29 5:56

Don't discriminate against polypolar planets, ableist shitlords.
http://www.zmescience.com/science/geology/earth-magnetic-poles/

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-29 9:35

>>27
It looks like it's gender-unsure or something.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-29 9:35

Scientists cut out a tadpole’s eyes and grew another one on its butt. The eye became functional

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-29 10:01

>>10
Four legs good, two legs bad.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -