>>7I'm saying their hardcore anti-dynamic linking stance is hypocritical in this context because there are more linux kernel vulnerabilities than there are dynamic linker vulnerabilities.
It's also probably easier to fix vulnerabilities in the dynamic linker than to fix vulnerabilities in the kernel.
the fact that GNU can't make a usable kernel says more about GNU than it does about kernels
Not really, even Apple can't make their own kernel from scratch (OS X and iOS are both built on top of BSD). And the Windows kernel is an antique piece of junk that's only survived into the modern era by piling layer upon layer of abstractions on top of it to keep it usable.