/prog/ - is /prog/ smart enough to crack this cipher?

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 2:55

1051541451431641621571721571511441234567881234567812345678123678326470547
2999999259923478990124999995689902993413269916749953349999914649932724997
2994567809912568990139956799809929936781467998299634699818991169966144990
2999994569970124995699801323459999012615302799995324993243699019923412993
2994567801993569980299356780239999456725634569974326992644399243992369936
2994567801992689901239967899029939945745315319931253399436998011992349950
2998012345299999388352999991039953991232012479934673289999982640499999415

Step1: Highlight the numbers
Step2: Ctrl and F
Step3: Put 9 in
Step4: Enjoy

Name: Overthrow 2016-09-28 12:52

Chinese Government

16830 88370 38469 50310 93290 27030 47303
83341 71413 19647 45881 88991 25492 09531
86710 46463 09969 54288 81077 49231 57932
29053 91599 19798 85697 19810 52347 15118

http://ai.neocities.org/GIX.html

Name: XML is Turing complete 2016-09-28 13:19

>>1,2
ebin :^)

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 13:56

>>1
But if I highlight the numbers on Google Chrome? (per step one)
Then it just doesn't work!

0/10, bugged instructions.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 15:46

>>4 It just displays "fuck you" when browser/editor highlights code searches for 9, turning the 9's darker/lighter.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:07

My phone doesn't have Ctrl.

Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:08

What kind of sissy would buy a phone? People like >>6-kun.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-03 20:04

>>1
what kind of cipher would this be called?

is it a kind of steganography?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 0:27

>>8
yes, technically it is(low-contrast information in images). But it has zero cryptographic strength as pattern of 9's is easily discovered.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 1:09

>>8
It's not even a cipher, as there isn't any cryptographic pattern to it.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 1:26

Can /prog/ decipher these dubs?

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 4:16

is /dubs/ smart enough to crack this dubscipher?

1051541451431641621571721571515461234567821234567812345678123678326470547
2992244253323478110124778895689902113413263316749953242288914645532724227
2334567804412568770136656711807728836781467448277634699818771368865184110
2998894568870124225622801323456699012615302711885324553243622013323412993
2114567801993563380244356780236688456725634569974326772642311243772368836
2334567801222687701235567866024431145745315312231251355436448031992346650
2668012345211779386352118891037753221232012476634673286611982640422119415

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 17:28

>>10

You could sort it, that would be a pretty good one way cipher.

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 23:29

>>12

s/\([0-9]\)\1\{1\}/##/g

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-05 12:26

>>14

\{1\}

What are you doing, nigger? Also, get a modern regex engine so you don't have to escape your grouping parens.

Name: delete meta 2016-10-06 4:21

>>14

it makes no fucking sense

you clearly answered my question with a good and varied response so why on earth would you sage

you CLEARLY wanted me to see it, so why would you not bump it?

it makes no fucking sense

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 8:19

>>16

you CLEARLY wanted me to see it, so why would you not bump it?

>>14-dono might have simply wanted the heavens to see it.

is /prog/ smart enough to crack this cipher?

1 Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 2:55

2 Name: Overthrow 2016-09-28 12:52

3 Name: XML is Turing complete 2016-09-28 13:19

4 Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 13:56

5 Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 15:46

6 Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:07

7 Name: Anonymous 2016-09-28 18:08

8 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-03 20:04

9 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 0:27

10 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 1:09

11 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 1:26

12 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 4:16

13 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 17:28

14 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-04 23:29

15 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-05 12:26

16 Name: delete meta 2016-10-06 4:21

17 Name: Anonymous 2016-10-06 8:19