Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

haskell brain damage cancer invades scheme*

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-11 1:33

http://blog.racket-lang.org/2007/11/getting-rid-of-set-car-and-set-cdr.html

(* depr derp we're not "scheme" anymore... i know)

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-22 12:20

>>39
Haskell isn't imperative.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-22 17:07

>>41
Of course it is.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-27 8:27

>>15
If you're able to declare and use many types, it's multityped. If you're stuck with just one type, its unityped. For example, you'd be hard pressed to declare two different types in Python or Ruby.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-27 9:35

>>43
Would I be hard pressed to declare two different types in Lisp or C?

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-27 12:13

>>4
Types in Lisp are runtime checks and types in C are the size and some syntactic sugar for choosing between signed, unsigned, floating-point, and pointer (to memory regions of a certain size) operations.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-27 12:37

>>44
Why don't you think for yourself before asking stupid questions.

>>45
Depends on the Lithp implementation, though. SBCL actually checks types at compile-time.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-27 17:22

>>46
I want to see your answer.
SBCL actually checks types
No.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-27 19:00

>>47
Most Lisps are unityped, C is multityped but with the ability to go untyped (which is not the same as unityped).

No.
Yes (you might need to change the speed and safety settings).

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 5:36

>>48
Most Lisps are unityped
Wow. Can you prove it? I need links and citations from Hyperspec.
C is multityped but with the ability to go untyped
So, with C I am able to declare and use many types, but still have the abitily to go get stuck with just one type?
Does this imply that with C I am not stuck with just one type, but still have the ability to go being unable to declare and use many types?
Yes
No

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 7:25

>>49
If you don't specify a type it defaults to int - some C standards don't allow it.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25171602/what-is-the-default-type-for-c-const

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 7:49

>>50
If I don't specify a type it is inferred.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 8:33

Behold the C inferred type:
http://codepad.org/1WLv8IwR

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 8:38

>>52
Do you understand that every expression in C has a type? Every.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 11:52

>>52
Not valid C.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 13:59

>>54
Not valid dubs.

Name: Anonymous 2016-11-28 14:48

>>55
valid idiomatic standard-conforming dubs
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -