Rebol, The Lisp Replacement

http://blog.hostilefork.com/rebol-vs-lisp-macros/
A good number of cases where Lisp programmers appear to require macros for expression is because ordinary Lisp functions are limited in how they can work with "context-dependent code fragments" passed as arguments. Rebol attacks this problem by making bindings of individual symbols "travel along" with their code fragments. The result is that many cases requiring macros in Lisp can be written as ordinary Rebol functions.

Rebol seems interesting but its proprietary. I wonder how's Red, the Rebol replacement, turning out

I'm gay!

>>3
Fuck all the way off

Jackson Steve get!!!! :^)

>>2

The compiler and linker are currently written in Rebol.
Download a Rebol interpreter suitable for your OS

$ file red-latest
red-latest: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.8, stripped
👌

Proprietary garbage.

age

We need more "I do not understand macros" blog posts.

>>9
heh..

we need more dubs