/prog/ - C-ryptocurrency stolen because of a typo in C code

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:33

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/a-source-code-typo-allowed-an-attacker-to-steal-370-000-zerocoin-592-000-/

Name: Steve 2017-02-25 17:41

c is a bug

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:43

let's see the diff

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:44

How do we know it wasn't themselves?

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 18:16

I am glad there are people like Cudder who can write safe, robust, optimized C code so my internet is 5% faster year on year.

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 18:22

let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff
let's see the diff

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:40

nice trips

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:41

let's see these guys post the diff

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:42

https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/commit/81a667867b5d84893e4c225a8d73eddd78ac16c2

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:42

      nBlockMinSize = std::min(nBlockMaxSize, nBlockMinSize);
 
     unsigned int COUNT_SPEND_ZC_TX = 0;
-    unsigned int MAX_SPEND_ZC_TX_PER_BLOCK = 1;
+    unsigned int MAX_SPEND_ZC_TX_PER_BLOCK = 0;
 
     // Collect memory pool transactions into the block
     int64 nFees = 0;

THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULDN"t USE "MAGIC NUMBERS".

#DEFINE ZERO 0
#DEFINE ONE 1

WOULD HAVE FIXED THIS

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 20:04

>>10
That doesn't look like a typo.

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 20:36

Let see them implement diff in zerocoin.

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 4:29

Spread the news to defeat the Jews!

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 7:05

C AGEIN PROVEN TO BE TERROR PROGRAMING!!! ALL COMPUTER VIRUSES ARE CREATED WITH C LANGUAGE! C IS HARMFUL N PROPER COMPUTER SCIENCE DOCTORS USE GOOD SCIENCE LANGUAGE LIKE HASKELL IM HASKELL COMPUTER SCIENCE DOCTOR

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:15

C-Shaming must stop. Until a valid alternative pops up, C will remain at the bottom of abstraction stack.

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:23

>>15
THER IS ALREDY A SAFE ALTERNATIVE CALLED HASKELL. HAVE U EVERN SEEN COMPUTER VIRUS IN HASKELL?? ALL COMPUTER VIRUS IS WORK OF C SCIENCE ENGENIERS!!! IN COMPUTERS SCIENCE PROGRAMING TEAMS WHEN AN EXPERIENCE DOCTOR SCIENTIST HEARS THE WORDS C PROGRAMING TOGETHER U WILL NOTICE A LOOK OF EXTREME TERROR IN HIS FACE. C IS TERROR FOR COMPUTER SCIENTISTS

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:34

>>16

C IS TERROR FOR COMPUTER SCIENTISTS

These nu-male marxist-functionalist academicucks probably debugged memory corruption at 3am once and got the PTSD for life.

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 11:12

>>15
Fortran, Ada, Objective-C. Lots of better alternatives that deserve to be at the bottom of abstraction stack more than C.

C-ryptocurrency stolen because of a typo in C code

1 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:33

2 Name: Steve 2017-02-25 17:41

3 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:43

4 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:44

5 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 18:16

6 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 18:22

7 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:40

8 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:41

9 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:42

10 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:42

11 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 20:04

12 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 20:36

13 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 4:29

14 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 7:05

15 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:15

16 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:23

17 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:34

18 Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 11:12

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:33

Name: Steve 2017-02-25 17:41

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:43

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 17:44

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 18:16

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 18:22

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:40

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:41

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:42

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 19:42

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 20:04

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-25 20:36

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 4:29

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 7:05

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:15

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:23

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 9:34

Name: Anonymous 2017-02-26 11:12