>>18Because once compiling for browsers graduates from being a shitty hackjob to an officially supported and intended thing, I won't have the choice to not use it for however long it will take the mental midgets in web development to notice that making your entire site a webassembly program is retarded for the same reason making your entire site a Flash application was retarded a decade ago. Judging from how long it took them to notice the latter, this will be a really fucking long time. It would be even longer this time because webassembly is not associated with a company whose fuckups could kill it; also all security flaws in it would be blamed on the browser vendors rather than the retards who pushed this braindead idea of a standard.