>>24None of this is standardized, so all of it must be written by hand every time or autogenned by crap like autotools which inserts 7000 lines of unmaintainable and unauditable crap to your program. Meanwhile, a portable program (i.e. one that doesn't depend on non-portable features) doesn't have to do any of this
because it is portable. The degree to which cetards debase language to make their shitheap look better is incredible. You can't switch implementations without serious work, but it's totally portable; it never recovers from errors, but it totally works; it doesn't map well to machine features, but it's totally close to the machine; and so on.