>>46C headers are perhaps the most mundane and boring part of what i write.
There is nothing extraordinary in macro composition, its lack of imagination of C users that restricts them into the pattern of using only simplest function macros.
Not only that, its highly dependent on GCC and C11 features so they're mostly showcase of what can be done with C, not what C code is normally.
C macros are versatile, but they aren't that great as a real language.
Building everything around text macros is an anti-pattern, like Boost preprocessor libraries.
Instead i prefer to think of them as underutilized tools of abstraction that can be added individually: without converting a project into macro-based sublanguage .