Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

i just made a cute 'hello world' app

Name: Anonymous 2017-07-29 17:56

https://pastebin.com/qprgVAmc
(couldn't post it here)

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-11 7:30

>>46
Userscripts are only useful thing he produced.

Name: VIPPER 2017-08-11 21:21

>>81
he also produced maymays

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-15 22:34

>>74
#!/usr/bin/env python3
stopped reading there

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-16 6:21

>>83
what's wrong with fioc3? it's better than fioc2 (minus the fact that you can't use string operations on ASCII type)

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-16 11:01

>>84
xrange

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-16 11:23

>>85
what's wrong with making lazy version default?

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-16 12:12

>>86
Meant the lack of.
Python 3 doesn't have the lazy one.

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-17 6:40

>>87
but you're wrong. range in py3 is the same as xrange in py2. py3 removed the eager version and removed the lazy one:

FIOC2

In [1]: r = range(0,10)

In [2]: r
Out[2]: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

In [3]: x = xrange(0,10)

In [4]: x
Out[4]: xrange(10)

In [5]: list(x)
Out[5]: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]


FIOC3

[1]: r = range(10)

In [2]: r
Out[2]: range(0, 10)

In [3]: list(r)
Out[3]: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]


also check'em

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-17 6:41

>>88
should be
removed the eager version and renamed the lazy one

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-17 7:02

>>88
py3 removed the eager version and renamed the lazy one:
if that's the case, then executing the following:

for i in range(0,100000000000):
continue;


Should cause no problems in py3, yes?

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-17 7:09

>>90
depends on how you define 'problem'. it seems to work the same as

for i in xrange(0,100000000000):
continue;

in py2 (I didn't let it run long enough to be sure because I need my CPU cycles), which means it takes a fuckton of time to execute but it doesn't throw. creating a large range object is possible, just like creating an xrange in py2 and unlike range in py2:

FIOC2
In [1]: range(0,100000000000)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MemoryError Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-1-ea3b586c469a> in <module>()
----> 1 range(0,100000000000)

MemoryError:

In [2]: xrange(0,100000000000)
Out[2]: xrange(100000000000)


FIOC3

In [1]: range(0,100000000000)
Out[1]: range(0, 100000000000)

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-18 17:11

>>56
I never actually cryptoanalyzed it, i'm not into that.
Then you'd know you shouldn't roll your own crypto.

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-18 17:58

>>87
Python 3 doesn't have the lazy one.
That would be pretty dumb, if you think about it.

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-20 10:00

>>1
Looks amateurish, unscalable and not web-ready.
See what actual software professionals create.
https://blog.alexellis.io/first-faas-python-function/

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-20 13:10

>>94
Translated to brainmemes
MicroscopicBrain.jpg : Owning a server
NormalBrain.jpg : Renting servers
LightsInBrain.jpg : Renting VPS
QuantumMind.jpg: Using Infrastructure as a service
EnlightenedMan.jpg: Using Platform as a service
MeditatingBuddhist.jpg: Using Software as Service
TheDestroyerOfReality.jpg : Using Microservices
MasterOfAllCosmos.jpg: Composing programs with Functions as a Service

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-20 13:15

What if in 2100 there only 5 clouds, personal computers are illegal and you have to pay cryptocoins from your neural implant to use Printf as a Service from a dumb neuroterminal?

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-20 13:41

>>96
if that's what the free market wants.......

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-20 14:11

>>94
I'm not sure I understand what this is.

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-20 14:40

Dubs.

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-20 15:41

>>99
Nice dubs.

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-21 2:45

>>96
That's fine. I won't live to see it.

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-22 1:13

>>101
Your children will....

Name: Anonymous 2017-08-22 2:01

>>102
But who cares?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List