Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Touhou Cirno Radio / chiru.no

Name: Anonymous 2017-10-06 21:50

What are your thoughts on this amazing piece of open source software?
https://gitgud.io/chiru.no/chiru.no

yes, this is programming related

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-06 14:20

lol

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-06 14:32

.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-06 16:28

>>119
Tell that to >>108.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-06 16:34

>>123
I can understand his argument in terms of using FLAC for archival, but for distribution, it's overkill.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-06 16:38

>>124
for archival
eeeeeeee eeeeeeeee eeeeeeeee
is bad ol' rotational velocidensity gonna destroy your songs????
FLAC files sound better than lossy audio files. So it's ok for distribution as well.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-06 16:46

>>125
So it's ok for distribution as well.
Sure, if everyone had average Internet speeds on par with South Korea and Japan. In my country, we unfortunately still have third world quality Internet and getting progressively worse.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-06 17:57

>>124
Yes. We've literally established that already. We also established that Flac isn't representative of lossless codecs nor mp3 of lossy. But >>108's rant basically did what you were just doing, where you talked about the universal qualities of lossy codecs and juxtaposed that to mp3's technical flaws while pretending like they're the same thing. And then >>114 accused >>113 of being nitpicky for calling out >>108's blatant shameless fallacy, and >>119 literally rehashed >>113's argument about why >>108's argument is disingenuous while criticizing >>116, who is in turn >>113.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 2:41

https://chiru.no/u/FLAC%20will%20eventually%20replace%20MP3.png

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 4:02

>>128
I was about to make a charming comment, before I realized that you highlighted that text, meaning you sincerely believe the arbitrary decisions of Mozilla as interpreted by one Catalin Cimpanu reflects the future of the Internet. You have yet to even acknowledge the practical restraints lossless media provides in terms of bandwidth, and you continue to perpetuate this retarded flac/mp3 dichotomy even though mp3 is literally deprecated.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 5:28

The human ear can only hear up to MP3 quality, anything higher is a waste of space and bandwidth

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 7:29

>>130
You're just as bad as the Flac guy. What quality is ``MP3 quality''? You do realize that there are different qualities of encoding, right? Which is why you can't judge a container simply based on one isolated instance of an mp3 file whose bitrate is obviously below the transparency threshold. There are legitimate arguments about the practical and technical obstacles of problems like this, but the two of you are stupidly fixated on mp3's and a bunch of isolated, insular flaws like a bunch of morons, yet you insist on pretending like your argument is exists to be meaningful rather than to simply have a minor win in your one-sided tirade against the mp3 menace. And against whom, you might ask? Against no one. You're literally convincing no one, because there's no one here to be convinced of what is obvious but unrelated fact like mp3 generally sucks among sites that still distribute in that archaic medium.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 9:46

>>131
What quality is ``MP3 quality''?
320KBPS 44.1 khz

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 10:38

<- dubs

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 18:22

>>133
Checked.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 22:37

>>133-134
Back to 4chan, please.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 22:53

>>132
That's the maximum quality, correct? In any case, I don't hear much of a difference between an mp3 encoded in that quality and a FLAC file.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 22:57

>>136
people like >>108-sama can hear it

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 23:07

>>115
So was gif but now all the patents have expired. Still, if I'm doing basic audio distribution, I'll prefer ogg, but it's nice that mp3 can now be used freely.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-07 23:17

>>137
Yeah, and people like that remind me of audiophiles that tout the superiority of vinyl records over digital discs.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 6:35

>>138
vinyl has a warmer more natural sound, digital audio sounds cold and sterile

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 6:36

>>140
oops, meant to reply to >>139

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 10:29

>>140
Can you say "buzzwords"?

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 10:29

>>142
buzzwords

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 12:24

>>140
can confirm

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 15:26

>>140
Vinyl sounds better because it is an analog medium.

The same reason film photographs look sharper than digital ones.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 18:08

>>136
In any case, I don't hear much of a difference between an mp3 encoded in that quality and a FLAC file.
Consider the following:
A song in FLAC: https://my.mixtape.moe/iclzak.flac
Same exact song in MP3 320kbps CBR: https://my.mixtape.moe/qlevfa.MP3
And just for shits n giggles, here's the song in OGG: https://my.mixtape.moe/cawjae.ogg

The OGG one doesn't sound as bad, but clearly FLAC one is definitive.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 21:02

>>146
Sounds like placebo.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-08 22:54

>>146
Wow, I knew MP3's were shitty, but I was suprised at just how much better the flac is.

WTF I love flac now!

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-09 0:52

>>146
OK, I can hear a slight difference between mp3 and ogg, but not much between ogg and flac. Then again, I'm using a cheap 10 year old pair of Sony MDR-G45 headphones.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-09 5:06

>>146
Which song is this?

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-09 19:32

>>150
Darude - Sandstorm

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-09 20:07

>>151
Back to YouTube, please.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-10 1:04

Non-YouTube post:
>>150
Back to HookTube, please.

Name: AWG 2018-01-11 15:31

why can't lossyfag die already?

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-11 17:34

>>154
fucking poor people

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-14 18:02

who wants lossy music in 2018??

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-14 18:34

>>156
me

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-14 18:37

>>120
It's Jesus
Who's Jesus?

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-14 18:38

>>157
No you don't.

Name: Anonymous 2018-01-15 16:09

FLAC Internet radio: https://chiru.no:8081/stream.flac

Only top tier headphones like the SR-007 allowed.

Reasons why FLAC is superior for streaming music over the Internet:

- Free, respects your freedoms
- Smaller filesize to wav, wma lossless and alac
- Original data
- Only needs 1mbit connection
- Lower algorithmic latency than opus
- Sounds better
- Lightweight compared to youtube videos
- More crisp highs, luscious lows, liquid soundstage
- Greater resolution detail
- Resolves better
- It's not the 90's anymore, you can stream FLAC
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode + RSS -