Google's Forced Deanonimization

https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/gmail/xbUFAblUAPM;context-place=topicsearchin/gmail/category$3Aother-web-browser-please-specify%7Csort:relevance%7Cspell:false

TLDR: you can't login, without giving away your physical identity. So if you google CP, they could instantly jail you.

Needs js.

>>2

"I travel a lot and, compared to other email providers like hotmail and yahoo I valued Google as not bothering me with "protecting my account locking me out".
I am now receiving the message "this device isn't recognised. For your security, Google wants to make sure that it's really you"

As a user I want to be able to disable this feature.
Is it anyway possible to have only the login/password with no additional features?"

"Stefano

As a user I want to be able to disable this feature.

You cannot"

"You can use the printed backup codes, or a dongle."

https://www.quora.com/How-can-you-create-a-Yahoo-account-without-entering-a-cell-phone-number-or-any-kind-of-phone-number-at-all

"You can't. If you don't have a mobile phone number, you can't complete the registration."

This is discriminatory towards non-mobile phone users. Fuck Goolag.

This is why we protest Google with services like HookTube.

>>7
Yeah go make your pedophile video requests in HookedNoseTube and stop pedophile-saging my threads.

>>8

pedophile

You say that like it's a bad thing.

Self-host

>>7
JS, does not work with youtubedl

>>10
hooktube is supposed to be a webapp version of youtubedl
it even says that on the website

From the FAQ:

I see no ads. Is HookTube funded by Soros?
HookTube is basically just youtube-dl in website form -- it discovers and manages pointers to Google's video files which are then loaded into your browser's native video player. The monthly cost of running HookTube is about the price of a 6-pack in my country.

>>11,12
I was under the impression that it was similar to archive.is.

>>13
lolno. Anyone who tries that would quickly go out of business because of the storage and bandwidth costs.

>>13

I'm just wondering, why Google won't give access to its own archive? I'm sure they keep older revisions of crawled sites.

Part and parcel of an unrestrained multinational.

you can use runbox instead of google