>>35I went on that ``tangent" to illustrate Mozilla's perspective in making that strategic decision. I was illustrating parallels between their business decisions and that of their progenitor. Beyond anything else, I thought it was interesting. You know, part of a friendly conversation. You know what that is, right? The fact that your so fixed in your own petty obsessions that you can't even put yourself in their shoes--can't even look at this issue through a business lense tells us more about you than it does yourself.
Then how about you tell me about the great features that make Firefox oh so much more that it seems on the surface?
Nope. No new features. Firefox 57 is perfectly identical to the previous release. And the one before that and the one before that with no progression, no innovation, no bug fixes nothing. Absolutely nothing's changed; nothing's good, nothing's bad. They only make new releases so that they can bump the number up. Honestly, I'm utterly perplexed as to where your complaints are coming from, since FF57
clearly has no new features--or changes at all, for that matter
! So, naturally, there are no new flaws, either. None. Nix.