New Firefox

It is worst of all. Just starting it, without opening any pages, already takes 600 Mb. It constantly accesses HDD and stops the world of garbage collection or page unloading or something. How can something be that bad?

>>38

I don't like X and I don't like how they fixed X because it caused Y'' ≠ ``I want X and not X haha look at me I'm so silly

Wow, I couldn't have summed it up better myself. Good job.

>>39
If what you say about inbound feature parity is true (I have my doubts, considering who we are talking about), I have a very simple question: Why the fuck did they break compatibility before the replacement was done?

>>41
Ah, good question. As I explained in my rant, I think it was probably out of desperation. What you suggest seems like a reasonable strategy, yes, but keep in mind that's what caused the end for Netscape--and for a bunch of other companies like Microsoft, even. The difference is that Netscape, like Mozilla, only had one product. Part of the reason why Mozilla tried (and failed) to diversify with projects like FirefoxOS. Also why they do a lot of charity work, to secure their place as a nonprofit organization and thus a fraction of their donorbase.