Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Open-source touhou clone

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 15:35

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:03

More of this, please.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:20

Jesus Christ, they somehow managed to make illustrations even worse than ZUN's. Besides that, even if the Touhou games are themselves proprietary, the assets are basically public domain, thus why it has such a large fandom, doesn't it? Even if not explicitly a free license, it kind of is, in an honorary way.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:21

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 17:56

>>4
Already know of that one.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-24 18:31

>>3
at first I thought you were joking, but then I opened it and was horrified. This has to be ironically bad.
At least the sprites are nice.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-25 17:46

>>3
youmu looks like a guy too

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-25 23:59

The illustrations are not code, thus nobody cares if they are "open" or not.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 0:11

>>8

implying there is any between code and data.

also, these hentai pics could serve as a code forcing you to click links and masturbate. Think about it, dolt. You're no smarter than my CPU.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 2:04

>>9
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 2:06

>>3
Might as well just release the assets under Cc0.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 3:04

>>10

Code is data, dolt.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 3:15

>>12
Okay, sure, but who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 4:46

>>13
the implications

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 5:03

>>14
That is a complete non-sequitur.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 6:29

Data is not code, dolt.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 9:48

>>16
But code is data.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 13:37

>>17
And?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 13:53

>>18
Code is data but data isn't code.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 14:59

Buffer overflouhou

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 16:27

>>16

Data can be interpreted as code.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 16:36

>>19
Data can be contained within code.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 17:12

Terrible!

They should have made that game with a CURRENT YEAR programming language like python or javascript + electron. That way they could have used the time saved by not dealing with low level C nonsense learning how to make good art instead.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 17:35

>>23
I can't tell whether or not this post is sarcastic.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 18:08

>>24
that's Edgar Poe's law

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-26 19:18

>>19
Did anyone claim otherwise? Dolt.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 4:44

>>26
Yes. >>18 prompted the question, which in turn elicited my answer.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 5:36

>>23
Using a horrible language like C is like summoning Satan. All of these C programmers are literally minions of Satan.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 6:08

>>23
That way they could have used the time saved by not dealing with low level C nonsense learning how to make good art instead
it's open sores. it's not about making something nice. there's no profit motive. it's all about ego and stroking themselves about how they can do pointer indirection like it's 1969.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 6:11

>>23
Or he could have paid someone to make them for cheap.
I mean the character sprites look normal, but I doubt it would have been expensive to order a few charater art.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 6:59

>>30
It seems like a lot of programmers literally just don't have the capacity to distinguish good art from the bad--not in the sense that one is more evocative than the other, but even the neurotypical layman can tell when a practitioner represents our natural world well through depictions of anatomy, plants, etc., although they aren't so perceptive to the shameless shortcuts many intermediate DA artists abuse. I was wondering about maybe offering him my own illustrations to him (not to say they're good, but they're better then his, and I figured a small project like this would be a cool stepping stone for my portfolio), but then I began to wonder if he actually likes it that way and would be insulted by my solicitations. It's not the first time that's happened to me. And I'd like to think I'm reasonably good at telegraphing humility and graciousness and general dick-suckery in my contacting prospective ``employers''.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 12:19

The art is awful. However, the game runs very well and seems good.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 14:23

>>32
It's open source, so fix the art yourself ;)))

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 14:40

>>31

implying programmers can't use ruler tool to measure proportions

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 16:42

>>34
You're basically namefagging at this point. I'd tell you to stop trying to force your stupid imagereddit memes, except no one's doing it other than you, and no one even cares enough to call you out anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 16:50

>>35
he thinks only one poster does this

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 17:27

>>36
Are you implying that there's more than one? Because you're just lying to yourself. It's so blatantly obvious from the newline you always make after the quotelink. You might as well be one person; to imply anything else would also be suggesting a hivemind capable of such mediocrity.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 17:40

>>37
It's so blatantly obvious from the newline you always make after the quotelink.
As far as I know, all of Nikita's confirmed posts look like that.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 18:49

>>37
Stop giving him hints about how to hide himself, thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 19:21

>>37

It's so blatantly obvious from the newline you always make after the quotelink.

lol you have finally discovered it!

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 19:23

>>40
Nobody ``discovered it'', we all knew from the start, you retard. And we also knew that you would change that up so as to create the illusion of multiple retards.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 20:22

>>41 fuck you and your ugly waifu!

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 21:19

whatever happened to steve?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 22:49

>>34,36
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-27 23:58

asking who they are quoting

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:20

>>45
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:21

being this dense

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:31

>>47
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:35

whatever

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:36

>>23,29
So just hire someone to do a better job with the artwork.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:39

>>49
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:43

>>51
not realizing I'm quoting his mum

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 0:46

>>52
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 1:49

Toe hoe: I pay the faeries with honey and in return I get to impregnate their toes.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:06

>>54
Toe hoe
Is that really how it's pronounced? Haha.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:22

>>55
if your faggot.....

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:42

>>53
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 2:47

>>57
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 3:18

>>58
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 4:03

>>59
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 4:14

>>60
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 7:46

>>61
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 8:56

>>62
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 8:58

>>42
shut up nikiketa, you'll never know true love you dumb bydlo.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 9:26

>>33
Agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 9:28

>>63
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 9:30

>>66
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 13:31

>>63,66-67
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 15:41

>>68
>>67 is quoting >>66, who is in turn being a retard.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 18:04

>>68
implying
>>69
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 19:05

>>70
Who are you quoting?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 19:27

>>70
Who are you cloning?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:04

>>71
implying

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:40

>>73
Who you quote?

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:41

>>74
Me quote implications.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:41

>>75
No quote implications; quote people.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:42

>>76
``no''

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:43

>>74-77
Get a life you dumb retard. Stop posting within a few minutes of yourself pretending like it's not yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 20:44

>>77
implication

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 21:54

>>78
Wow, you really saw past my amazing ruse. I was so sure I tricked everyone with my blatant prose and small time window, but you, Master Detective, with perfect grammar called me out on my devilish farce. And to what end, might I ask, could I possibly have for deceiving everyone? You'll need motive if you want to try me in a court of law. ... Or could it possibly be that I was joking? Well, I guess you won, anyway, for bumping a thread that was already at the top.

Name: Anonymous 2017-12-28 22:54

>>1-80
all me

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List