Windows 10 Taskbar

It has been more than 20 years since Windows 95, and taksbar still doesn't function properly:
http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/forum/id-3053045/taskbar-fullscreen.html

It is like I'm using some crappy Linux, developed by hobbyists. And I remember pretty clearly that Windows XP had properly working taskbar. So why it is so broken now? Have Microsoft decided to turn their OS into Linux? Guess it is finally the year of Linux desktop!

>>34
All of this is an outright lie.

>>41
don't bother arguing with the bydlo

1215/812 HEIL LENNART

>>44 heil dubs

>>41

Tell us about >>40

>>45
This is a form of analysis, this code is not copy pasted into the Openapoc project. You cannot point to any place in the Openapoc codebase where these functions are pasted into the codebase because they do no such thing. What they do is study the behavior of the reversed code in order to create software specifications about what their Openapoc needs to do.

generally speaking, IDA output is neither directly compilable nor directly assemblable so the idea that engine recreations are just IDA (or other decompiler/deassembler) copypasta is laughable to anyone who has experience with RE

>>47
>IDA output is neither directly compilable nor directly assemblable
You're lying again, linuxtard. I've personally took IDA's output and compiled it without even knowing how it works. Se decode0x3C in
https://github.com/saniv/sau/blob/master/src/fmt_bmc.c

>>37,48

Exactly what I'm doing right now. Check commit history.
Sign in to GitHub

Yeah, nah.

>>49

GitHub censored my account, requiring people to login before reading anything I posted, due to me publishing https://github.com/saniv/free-game-art/blob/master/foss-copyright-infringement-records.md which turned into a massive shitstorm with Linux thieves demanding github to ban me.

>>48
are you being obtuse on purpose, bydlo? ok, let me rephrase that in the most pedantic way possible: IDA decompiles to pseudocode which is a superset of C. it's not guaranteed to be compilable, and if it's compilable it's not guaranteed to work the same way as the original. simple programs might be easily decompileable but anything even moderately complex probably won't be. see for example this: https://github.com/GabrielRavier/Cave-Story-Disassembly - Cave Story isn't that complex of a game and yet its IDA output can't be compiled. surely you won't be able to compile something as complex as Photoshop.

in general, IDA is an Interactive Deassembler. your're are not supposed to use it to automatically acquire code, it's more of a manual process.

tl;dr go fuck your're are self, nikita

>>51
In most cases IDA's output does compile with little or no changes and using it in anyway is theft. The only valid use of IDA on is for security analysis, or decompiling the program you actually own (i.e debugging your compiler's output). Although US law does allow reverse engineering file format handling code to create interoperable competing software, you can't reuse the code and to avoid copyright infringement, reversing is done by one person, who publishes format specification, without any implementation details, while other person, having no knowledge of original source code, writes implementation from scratch.

>>52
fortunately I don't live in the US

>>52

most cases

citation needed

>>54

I will cite ur're are mom.

XFCE taskbar(in deskbar vertical mode) has the annoying property of stealing side pixels that force me to maximize editor windows every time. Its like it pushes windows a little to the side, hiding the right-side vertical slider.

>>56
Enjoy your're are autism.