There is no such thing as privacy. Connecting to the internet = walking outside in public. No one has any expectation of privacy when they're walking on the sidewalk. Why? Because you can understand that it's a physical space where everyone can physically see you. It's the same thing with the internet, but normalfags arrogantly expect secrecy just because what's on their screens aren't physically visible to other physical eyeballs.
The second you plug a cable into your wall to connect to the internet, everything you do after that point should be considered completely public information, especially to the megacorporations whose servers you are connecting to and the CIA/NSA/FSB who lets you exist. TOR and other shit won't save you. Everyone and their dog knows how to deanonymize you. Connecting to another computer = the other computer(s) knows what you're doing. No amount of onion routing kool-aid will change this; it's basically a law of physics.
If a company like Facebook wants to give me MONEY or a SERVICE in exchange for my data that is already public anyway because I choose to use the internet, then why the fuck not? Is there even any meaningful difference, from an individual's standpoint, between Facebook and a government? They're both psycopathic vampires with massive resources and power over you. I'll go with the one that's actually giving me something in exchange rather than just taking away my freedom. If you're going to anally rape me anyway, at least give me a reacharound.
Name:
Anonymous2019-01-30 9:58
>Connecting to the internet = walking outside in public Explain.
Name:
Anonymous2019-01-30 10:36
>>3 Using the Internet, computers connect to each other. They transmit data and communicate with each other, primarily using the TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol). Think of TCP/IP as a book of rules, a step-by-step guide that each computer uses to know how to talk to another computer. This book of rules dictates what each computer must do to transmit data, when to transmit data, how to transmit that data. It also states how to receive data in the same manner. If the rules are not followed, the computer will not be able to connect to another computer, nor send and receive data between other computers.
Name:
Anonymous2019-01-30 13:29
The linker is the thing that delivers the last arrangement yield from the item documents the compiler created. This yield can be either a mutual (or dynamic) library (and keeping in mind that the name is comparative, they haven't got much in the same way as static libraries referenced before) or an executable.
It interfaces all the article documents by supplanting the references to unclear images with the right locations. Every one of these images can be characterized in other article records or in libraries. On the off chance that they are characterized in libraries other than the standard library, you have to educate the linker concerning them.
At this stage the most well-known blunders are missing definitions or copy definitions. The previous implies that either the definitions don't exist (for example they are not composed), or that the article records or libraries where they live were not given to the linker. The last is self-evident: a similar image was characterized in two diverse item documents or libraries.
>>6 It's like Asian pussy, you can see there's someone walking but they're all fuzzed out.
Name:
Anonymous2019-01-30 13:56
>>6 It is the pizza delivery. In this case, it could be compared to maintaining the conversation with the pizza parlor over the phone and providing enough data to link the order, payment details, and delivery address (PII).